So every Mac menu conceivably had (has?) 7 sets of contents, 6 of which are essentially secret. Idiotic.
93 karma · joined February 13, 2019
So every Mac menu conceivably had (has?) 7 sets of contents, 6 of which are essentially secret. Idiotic.
Which is pretty depressing.
Kind of defeats the purpose of tabbing through apps in the first place, when you leave it minimized in the dock after you switch to it.
DUHHHH Apple.
Then again, they DID implement Command-Tab app switching from Windows... but managed to screw it up by not restoring the app from a minimized state when you switch to it.
When people carp about "benefits," that's really what they're talking about, isn't it? And it's an anachronistic result of incompetent legislation from the WWII era.
Fix THAT. Then we can all have "benefits" without any dependence on a particular job.
If someone posts a classified ad for a handyman to fix their stairs and offers $50, I can take it or not. But taking it and then whining that I didn't get benefits... and being abetted in that whining by clueless politicians... is disgraceful.
Thereby driving them out of business and eliminating this form of employment (which is clearly contractual and not "regular").
Then there's the glued-together chassis, the soldered-in RAM and drives... when those go bad (and they will), you get to just throw the computer away instead of performing a routine replacement.
Apple's shoddily-made computers should be hanging from pegs in blister packs at Walgreen's.
It's too bad that Apple has given up on real computers. And Windows is a pathetic mess... so in the end, computers are returning whence they came: to the domain of scientists, hobbyists, and other serious users.
Revoke the app and developer account of that guy who wrote the free transit-mapping app for Montreal.
Google: hypocrisy on a colossal scale.
Lately they churn out another "Apple headed for disaster" article every day. Someone there is shorting AAPL and thinking no one will figure it out.
We have lots and lots of words; I don't believe this BS phrase fills an otherwise unfillable gap.
A design that lets you save energy after takeoff by using lift from wings and forward propulsion... maybe.
I find the '14 and '17 additions vastly improve C++ and in fact added things that I had just come to appreciate in Swift. So don't be too put off; learning the new stuff will help you if you need to adopt a more-recent language too.
How so?
I'm currently working on a project where we have indeed decided we needed to go Swift/Kotlin native on each platform, but with the long-term goal of building a cross-platform app with Qt.
Qt certainly has its issues, but I respect what its developers have accomplished. And it appears to offer adequate ways to do common things like parse JSON, and it abstracts things like Bluetooth usage and file storage in the apps' sandboxes; so I don't see some of the hurdles cited in this article.
Nice strawman, but portability has long since been achieved.
You say you prioritize usability but then defend an idiotic and regressive design that impedes usability so disgracefully that even Apple has had to admit failure.
The trackpads are another failure, being way too big and thus suffering from spurious contacts from the heels of your hands. Why didn't Apple at least make the giant trackpads useful by having the Pencil work on them?
They did the same thing to the Eject key: They put a hardware DELAY on it, so you couldn't remap it to be a real Delete key.
How can Apple work so hard to screw up a KEYBOARD? Incredible.