Anecdotes are not a very useful tool in discussions about generalisations. They provide little evidence aside from saying that it's a category of event that can exist. No one at any point has said citations are gospel. Just that anecdotes aren't adding much to the discussion at hand. If you've got issues with the cited data, be precise instead of casting general aspersions on academia.
Yep, we've got the camera mounted vertically above the screen. We use the dance floors to render an interactive Unity game. The pixel density is pretty good. These panels have an array of IR LEDs embedded in them for detection but the density isn't good enough for small objects we want to track. Great for detecting anything the size of a foot or bigger.
We use IR Floodlights + IR absorbing film + a high speed IR camera. Works great in most lighting conditions and the screen doesn't show up on the camera.
I've just done something similar with a Object tracking + IR Floodlights and one of VA Imaging's MER2 cameras. We have had some fantastic results with objects sat on these "Interactive Dance Floors" from Alibaba. Didn't even need the IR Absorbing film to get decent tracking results using OpenCV @ 300fps or so.
Yes, the issue is the ancestry between "fish" being very distant. It doesn't matter if you exclude marine mammals. Many fish in the ocean are still more closely related to beings on land than another fish. It's the equivalent of calling all flying animals birds. If we excluded bats from this new definition of "bird" then a bumblebee won't suddenly become more closely related to a Buzzard.
I agree here a fair bit, not that I'm an expert or anything. I'd like to see some progress on some of the neuronal modelling. It seems since 'attention is all you need' they've locked into this LLM stack and gluing up models as data pipelines rather than integrating different NN's on a deeper level.
Because people need to run their Apps on multiple targets and having one codebase for all targets helps with keeping maintenance and development costs down. Java would meet this requirement if the UX/UI story was anywhere near as good as the Web's. I'd argue that UI has been the main driver of all of this.