Quinner

They were already colluding to form a monopoly, I don't think antitrust prosecutions are going to be forthcoming.

I work for a publisher. I appreciate quality content. This is a rehashed press release, I shouldn't be expected to pay for it.

Why do people link to basic stories like this behind a paywall? If WSJ has an original piece out, fine, but this could've come from any one of a thousand sources.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-28/amazon-sal...

There's a reason you'll only see their number say >99%

Also the whole government control and censorship of the internet thing.

Because we are living proof that alien life is possible. If alien life exists, we are alien life to them.

The first case only works if you already know the name of the program you want. Otherwise you're funneling straight down the google rabbit hole.

"I've been paying very close attention to the responses of my body to different foods, etc."

Your personal anecdote is not a rigorous scientific study.

The troubles in Venezuela started while the oil price was still high.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortages_in_Venezuela

The spec is fine but they mis-wired the cable in the factory, badly.

That exists, it's called Social Security.

Why does this have anything to do with it's status as a B-corp, rather than other market pressures on Etsy specifically, including Amazon's efforts in the space?

Except the NYT has surprisingly turned things around, considering five years ago they were a dinosaur on it's way out, much as Yahoo was and is.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/business/media/new-york-ti...

Correct, different developer, same publisher.

I'm all for bringing down the government, but I have to believe there's a better way to do that than Donald Trump.

So you're comparing the theoretical speeds in lab tests to actual speeds in the real world of older wifi tech? That's not really a fair nitpick.

Or, you know, any of the several Windows releases since XP.

It's really a mix of over-regulation and under-regulation, with a lot of regulatory capture. In this case the monopolies are not illegal, they're actually protected by regulation.

I think your nit-picking needs more thought, nuclear bombs are illegal for an individual to possess, and if someone had managed to obtain a bomb from say the former USSR, they would most definitely be considered a criminal.

It's worse, because a gun is a discrete physical item. Encryption code is virtual and infinitely replicable, regulation is extremely ineffective at restricting it from those that want it.

This is their response: https://www.ampproject.org/

That's probably an official exchange rate, with the currency being much weaker unofficially.

Wut.