6,354 karma · joined February 9, 2012
It's harder to do than it looks. Offshoring to places with lower wages has kept wages for many white- and blue-collar workers in the West from growing. But it is hard to do correctly.
I suspect AI or AGI or AI with agents will take a longer time to actually work reliably than many suspect.
In the past you could do almost anything on a personal computer, it was generally about as fast as mainframe or high end workstation.
Training large AI models is currently impossible for most home users. They just do not have the processing power.
Perhaps employee protection is better in Australia than in the US?
The paper is way overhyped. They've just built a meta material near field antenna. Nothing new I can see.
There are other papers available via Googling that glucose can be measured at around 4.2GHz. Seems hard to do it reliably, though.
I'll take a closer look at the paper in Nature.
Aubrey Maturin is better in terms of style, plot, environment and language.
I'd recommend the Bernard Cornwell's Sharpe series to anyone who likes O'Brian. He writes superbly too, but has more action.
Both Intel and AMD are working on embedding this into their CPUs.
However, the target use appears to be servers with multiple VMs, not laptops.
Eban's "Bottle of Lies" book is shocking: https://www.katherineeban.com/bottleoflies
Peter Attia on Youtube also did an investigation on this.
If you're lucky your drugs have the right amount of the active ingredient. If you're unlucky they have chalk dust in them. If you're even more unlucky, they have carcinogens in them.
There are sulphur-crested cockatoos (a type of large Australian parrot) that are documented to have made it over 100 years.
The only reason I can think of to use a Pi is GPIO.
I just went to it and had a look. Turned to junk now by the looks of things.
That way, they've advertised, could not find anyone suitable, and can employ the person they really want.
We will see what happens long term the second time around.
The modern company is a very very limited liability company:
- Cut corners so your jets crash and kill people (Boeing)?
- Cheat on emissions testing so your product kill people (VW)?
- Hush up drug trial results so you kills people (Pfizer)?
- Sloppy security leads to hundreds of millions of people's personal data being leaked (too many to mention)?
What happens to those in charge? Nothing. Perhaps they leave with a big golden handshake. If it's really bad, they get a don't do it again agreement with the Feds.
No accountability means no feedback/skin in the game. So nothing gets better.
The Economist magazine is not what it used to be, sadly.