91% have a favorable view of Amazon
73% trust Amazon with their information
70% say Amazon has a positive effect on society
81% would be disappointed if Amazon disappeared
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21144680/verge-tech-survey...
17,615 karma · joined June 15, 2012
91% have a favorable view of Amazon
73% trust Amazon with their information
70% say Amazon has a positive effect on society
81% would be disappointed if Amazon disappeared
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21144680/verge-tech-survey...
He also talked about the actual implementation a lot during the campaign.
91% with a favorable view of Amazon, and that's sourced via a media company:
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21144680/verge-tech-survey...
Amazon the 2nd most trusted brand in America:
They never say "Take this out, take that out." They say "add more, add more!"
There's an old saying that I love about design, it's about Japanese gardening actually, that "Your garden is not complete until there is nothing else that you can remove." -Will Wright
SF meddled with no regard for the obvious effects of price controls. You would expect to see previously viable delivery options or radius reduced as a result.
Rule 1: Stand up straight with your shoulders back
Rule 2: Treat yourself like you would someone you are responsible for helping
Rule 3: Make friends with people who want the best for you
Rule 4: Compare yourself with who you were yesterday, not with who someone else is today
Rule 5: Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them
Rule 6: Set your house in perfect order before you criticise the world
Rule 7: Pursue what is meaningful (not what is expedient)
Rule 8: Tell the truth – or, at least, don’t lie
Rule 9: Assume that the person you are listening to might know something you don’t
Rule 10: Be precise in your speech
Rule 11: Do not bother children when they are skate-boarding
Rule 12: Pet a cat when you encounter one on the street
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2018/01/jo...
> Even though their pizza isn't really as good as the fancy pizza place at the mall
They opened the "not best pizza option" and "nTH restaurant option".
Opening a restaurant is a good example of what to avoid if you want to be resilient in the face of bad luck. It's a fragile and brutal business even in the best of times.
Maybe they should just have a disclaimer on every video: "Watch this with a critical eye and a grain of salt. Perhaps a truckload of salt. Use your brain."
“In major parts of Sweden, around Stockholm, we have reached a plateau (in new cases) and we’re already seeing the effect of herd immunity and in a few weeks’ time we’ll see even more of the effects of that. And in the rest of the country, the situation is stable,” Dr. Anders Tegnell, chief epidemiologist at Sweden’s Public Health Agency
Tegnell said sampling and modeling data indicated that 20% of Stockholm’s population is already immune to the virus, and that “in a few weeks’ time we might reach herd immunity and we believe that is why we’re seeing a slow decline in cases, in spite of sampling (testing for the coronavirus) more and more.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/22/no-lockdown-in-sweden-but-st...
Now their TEDx talk on the other hand... speaking of silly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8J5BWL8oJY
To me that was the moment both Magic Leap and TED (sadly) jumped the shark.
Max Tegmark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybIxWQKZss8
Stephen Wolfram: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUCwtLTUPQ4
Steven Weinberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpMk9G-ddiM
I particularly liked Max's answer who neatly makes the distinction between the structure (we discover) and the language (we invent). We're free to invent the names, but not the structures.
So depressing.
1. https://samharris.org/podcasts/140-burning-fourth-estate/
It seems to me he's just exploring ideas in the open. That's great. I don't see the problem.
We want delivery to every address, but certainly there is a problem when ~50% of what's being delivered is junk mail[1]
That said, I wasn't entirely convinced by the Freedom Dividend and wish it hadn't been the centerpiece. What I was more interested in and really appreciated was his overall approach and focus on problems and solutions. An actual problem solver and uniter, not someone perpetuating the WWE reality TV show that is our politics.
https://www.axios.com/andrew-yang-2020-media-attention-acc26...
https://vocal.media/theSwamp/a-visual-history-of-the-yang-me...
The whole structure of the debates and 24/7 news coverage is more about reality TV than any kind of substance. It's geared for soundbites and drama. So someone like Yang doesn't fit into that, but shines in long form formats like podcasts.
When nuclear is shut down, it's often replaced by coal. See also Japan, with a lot of coal plants coming up:
"It is one unintended consequence of the Fukushima nuclear disaster almost a decade ago, which forced Japan to all but close its nuclear power program. Japan now plans to build as many as 22 new coal-burning power plants — one of the dirtiest sources of electricity — at 17 different sites in the next five years, just at a time when the world needs to slash carbon dioxide emissions to fight global warming."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/03/climate/japan-coal-fukush...
And a lot of people aren't aware nuclear is the safest form of energy per TWh: https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
I was thinking $20, heh.
Apple would make cheaper, less fancy versions.
A lot of people would stop upgrading every year or two. That's hugely wasteful anyway.
More people would buy used.
Couldn't just make that $0 with a $9k purchase?
https://www.pewresearch.org/ft_dual-income-households-1960-2...
Prior to that most households were single income.
Also, in the referenced video he says he wants to work on further developing the theory now. It's not complete and doesn't claim that it'll work. He says repeatedly that it may be wrong, even pointing out it could be fools gold. He also notes he's not a physicist and doesn't have all the necessary skills.
He's openly questioning, starting to present an idea and working on it.
At this point it doesn't strike me charlatan-like and I don't see how it's dangerous given all of his disclaimers... just seems like an outsider taking an unorthodox approach.
Certainly in any specific dispute one may be correct. Or both partially correct. Or both wrong. And one may be better or worse than the other in sum.
Why not demand better on all fronts? None of the aforementioned media are doing grade A work.
They're just different teams playing the same game.
Fans always defend their team and vilify the other. Always. With every dispute they're able to convince themselves it's the other side that are the cheaters. They can't both be right, but yet each side feels equally certain of their position.
2. Really?!
3. You?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/health/hospitals-coronavi...
How do we put a swift end to this nonsense? Surely the public will be overwhelmingly on the side of doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers.
Everyone will have to figure out what works best for their particular situation. For some that'll be remote, for some office and for others a mix of the two.
I think the important thing is for companies to consider the options in a thoughtful, big picture way. Also not assume that current remote productivity is indicative of remote work during non-pandemic times, heh.
Asian countries have shown the way here. Let's get moving on adopting social norms and habits around mask usage.