Rexxar

- quite young account

- all comments are roughly the same size

- only top level comments, never reply to other comments

So probably very old accounts

That you take more time to search yourself before asking other to do it.

> Advice: just put the link and skip snarky commentary

As usual, the one requesting compliance to other is often the worst offender.

> Apart from the guy claiming an imaginary "all security bugs will be fixed" which I already said I disagree

That was exactly the point of the 'bluedragon1221' initial comment you were responded to. So finally you agree ?

I didn't use the word 'fanatic' neither the previous comment you were responded too.

> Can you discuss productively without attacks?

So you thing someone telling you "look a little harder" is a "personal attack" ? After I took some time to give you a link you ask for ?

> I'm not seeing fanaticism.

You are the only one using this word in this discussion.

"bigiain" comment, in the same discussion is an example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48120707

There is comment like this everywhere, if you don't see them it's just that you don't want to see them. There are a little less frequent than 5 years ago but still frequent enough in each c, c++ or rust discussions.

It's not performative.

At the moment, it sort of work for simple one-file project with no dependencies if you don't mind there is no garbage collector. (it try to compile recursively library imports but linking logic is not implemented)

They had a deficit last year, so they can probably avoid to pay tax this year by balancing last year loss with this year profit.

  > Someone didn't get the memo that for LLMs, tokens are units of thinking.

If you go on particular laws, you can see the previous versions and how it changed. Example: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT0000...

Click on "version" then "comparer" buttons and you will see a diff.

The code of the article: https://github.com/ieviev/mini-gzip/blob/main/src/main.rs

Top level declarations of the C code:

    #define MAXBITS 15   
    #define MAXLCODES 286
    #define MAXDCODES 30
    #define MAXCODES
    #define FIXLCODES 288

    struct state

    local int bits(struct state *s, int need)
    local int stored(struct state *s)

    struct huffman

    local int decode(...)
    local int construct(...)
    local int codes(...)

    local int fixed(...)
    local int dynamic(...)
    int puff(...)

    const MAXBITS: usize = 15;
    const MAXLCODES: usize = 286;
    const MAXDCODES: usize = 30;
    const FIXLCODES: usize = 288;
    const MAXDIST: usize = 32768;
    struct State<'a> 
    struct Huffman<'a>

    fn decode
    fn construct
    fn codes
    fn fixed
    fn dynamic
    fn stored
    pub fn inflate

They are not counter-example. You use the other "in-" prefix that take an adjective and give the opposite adjective, not the one that create a verb from a noun.