Only to those who paid into the system and far less than they personally could have earned on investing the same dollars.
1,789 karma · joined May 9, 2012
Only to those who paid into the system and far less than they personally could have earned on investing the same dollars.
No idea if subsidies disproportionately subsidize fuel ethanol over non-fuel usage.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/APU0000703112
If the intent of the government is to pour subsidies into domestic beef production to stabilize prices they're doing a crap job.
Compare corn: https://www.macrotrends.net/2532/corn-prices-historical-char...
https://usafacts.org/articles/federal-farm-subsidies-what-da...
Tofu and ethanol may be more price-distorted by the US government than is beef, but I dunno how to quickly support that idea with hard data beyond what I cited above.
I don't think often, but when I do, it's in stereotypes. Stay dismissive my friends.
The COBOL thing seems to be working out just fine last I heard. Today a small number of people get paid well to know COBOL's depths and legacy platforms/software. The world moved on, where possible, to lower cost labor and tools.
Arguably, that outcome was the right creative destruction. Market economics doesn't long-term incentivize any other outcomes. We'll see the arc of COBOL play out again with LLM coding.
145K is roughly the population of Syracuse, NY or Midland, TX. That is far more than the absolute number of US military deaths in World War I (116,516 per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualt...).
> We are often faced with 45-button remote controls, and multi-level menus of options to navigate. This can be ok in everyday life, but when you transport to the spiritual dimension of the Grateful Dead show, or when you are tripping, menus and buttons are the last thing you can deal with.
> The Time Machine needs to be controlled with knobs, a few buttons, and intuition. And if it doesn’t do exactly what you want, maybe it will do something that you need anyway.
Add any paper you pick up to your tracking system before you read it. Make that part of your reading ritual.
Save the PDF right away, too. You may later lose access to the journal. Or, CiteULike (where I^Hyou uploaded all those articles) may go away.
Putting cash into a somewhat closed system is particularly inflationary.
So, this well-meaning humanitarian idea of cash transfer (a) funds an authoritarian regime while (b) adding inflation woes to the people it's trying to help.
[1] https://apnews.com/article/united-states-government-fd411341...
NJ has effectively a publicly operated system of private schools where the tuition is the tax burden.
> I’m going to need HN geeks to get over analog headphones from the 60s
I am saying that not all adoration of the analog headphone jack is baseless. And we shouldn't universally move on.
I am envisioning the PR arguments now when the first instinct of the junior developer is to clobber the prior gold standard outputs. Especially lovely when testing floating point functionality using tests with tolerances.
Some things should be hatefully slow so one's brain has sufficient chance to subconsciously mull over "what if I am wrong?"
Story is I started a new job. I tried to add a corporate address for a corporate card to Google Wallet. This tripped some security indicator requiring me to upload government-issued ID. I did so twice without it working despite first/last/address match. I have tried also submitting an employment verification letter with the corporate address. Haven't heard back on the last attempt.
I have also written but I have low hope that'll work. (Update: Nope, "Billing and Collections" isn't "Payments" but at least they wrote back).
Because of the incomplete verification, all Google service payments are rejected right now. I am presently frantically emptying my Google One storage to get back under the free tier before my paid One subscription runs out. Literally, because I cannot submit a $2 payment I am right now removing attachments from 20 years of correspondence.
This stinks. I just need a human to review what I submitted given the above context. There should be some middle ground between rejecting a new credit card address and de facto locking down someone's entire collection of Google services via manufacturing an inability to pay.