1,327 karma · joined January 14, 2020
So good
Honestly tho, I keep the tool in my belt because I believe it is still the best for what I use it for: low latency financial applications and game engines.
If I find some time to migrate from c++ to a different language I may for certain games, but thats a future bridge to cross.
Bart Simpson, we need you.
It is beginning to become an awful situation where these companies are selling tools that undermine the student. Education is suppose to be the great equalizer in society, not another toggle or tool for oppression.
Absolutely
Adore your handle
Yes, we may ask the question whether or not speculative uses of AI in other manners have negative implications, and these should be asked, but that isn't the case here.
It is very much like asking the question if cars, upon inve tipn, started driving into random fields with no restraint, off-roading as if any car owner woulddo this, upon the sight of seeing a new motor carriage driving down a street. Important questions to ask of emergent technology, sure, but right now that motor carriage is on the road, let it be.
I think this is going to be a new golden age kf innovation. Lot of senior engineers capable of pencil whipping microservice infrastructure paired with industry experience means startup mill goes brrrr
There should be some liability for malpractrice even if generated by an llm
Sorry my Omnissiah is acting up again
I fail to reach this interpretation in this thread.
Has its pros and cons, of course.
And there's always a bigger fish.
Perhaps it is a generational gap, but the idea that I have to justify NOT attempting to squeeze a hustle out of absolutely everything I do reduces my trust in any content generated in [current year] as nothing more but a carefully crafted advertising space.
With more seriousness, I find people who drill deep into the bedrock of knowledge and expertise will find that tact and conviction in informed opinion is a healthy counterweight to this possible habit.
I find it incredibly challenging to come to these ideas without having walked a path which consistently challenges someone who strives to succeed through challenge, without a mentor. Ofc this is just my opinion.
Easier said than done and requires staying on top of literature and sourcing multiple opinions.
Maybe trips abroad to get that alternative opinion for peace of mind?
All spoken from an understanding that the average person cannot afford the time or expense associated with this idea.
1. Pass off an opinion as fact
2. Posit a straw man
3. Tether an unrelated fact as correlation.
I bet one could wire an llm instructed to such a formula to obsfucate otherwise fruitful public discourse.
Often when I return to what I write, about 60% I look back at with the novelty gone, and reassess from a more suitable eye and cross them off the list.