2,261 karma · joined February 9, 2013
I'd be interested in hearing about experiences of using duckdb files though, i can see instances where it could be useful to us
There are also some interesting points in the following podcast about ease of use and transactional capabilities of duckdb which are easy to overlook (you can skip the first 10 mins): https://open.spotify.com/episode/7zBdJurLfWBilCi6DQ2eYb
Of course, if you have truly massive data, you probably still need spark
Here's another example on the Suno website: https://suno.com/song/fc991b95-e4e9-4c8f-87e8-e5e4560755e7
I guess it's just like many tools, they can be used well or badly, and people need to learn how to use the well to get value from them
I think often AI sceptics go too far in assuming users blindly use the AI to do everything (write all the code, write the whole essay). The advice in this article largely mirrors - by analogy - how I use AI for coding. To rubber duck, to generate ideas, to ask for feedback, to ask for alternatives and for criticism.
Usually it cannot write the whole thing (essay, program )in one go, but by iterating bewteen the AI and myself, I definitely end up with better results.
Also, any recommendations for suitable ssds, ideally not too expensive? Thank you!
This is something that particularly frustates me in the case of buses the UK. They're ridiculously expensive (well, except for the temporary current £2 scheme), and empty. There seems to be a political consensus that we should have them, so it would make far more sense for them to be free in all instances, except when demand is so high they're full (e.g. rush hour)
- Take some dense research paper or other material that is unsuitable for listening to aloud
- Listen to it (via NotebookLLM) whilst commuting/washing up or whatever
This way you'll have a big headstart on what it's all about when you come to read the details.
I imagine in future we'll see a version of this where the listener can interject and ask questions too, that feels like a potentially very powerful way to learn.
I guess it's always been true to some extent that single individuals are capable of amazing things. For example, the guy who's built https://www.photopea.com/. But they must be exceptional - this empowers more people to do things like that.
I you like coding because of the things it lets you build, then LLMs are exciting because you can build those things faster.
If on the other hand you enjoy the mental challenge but aren't interested in the outputs, then I think the future is less bright for you.
Personally I enjoy coding for both reasons, but I'm happy to sacrifice the enjoyment and sense of accomplishment of solving hard problems myself if it means I can achieve more 'real world' outcomes.
Another thing I'm excited about is that, as models improve, it's like having an expert tutor on hand at all times. I've always wanted an expert programmer on hand to help when I get stuck, and to critically evaluate my work and help me improve. Increasingly, now I have one.
Ever given? Yes, I give through a regular deduction from payroll (I'm a giving what you can pledgee)
What keeps me committed? Knowing that I'm having an impact. I give mostly to GiveDirectly and find it almost impossible to read about the recipients and not want to give more: https://live.givedirectly.org/