RubyPinch

    Warning: Alpha version, still under development. Nothing works yet.

notty seems to be trying to push that text-centricness as far as possible however

https://github.com/withoutboats/notty

Its shaming, forceful, and trying to use negative emotions (fear specifically imo) as a call to action.

I am not commenting on if the justifications are valid or not, just the tone.

I think aggressive, passionate calls to action are pretty great! However I don't feel that being a downer is the best addition to a call to action!.

Political inaction might very well be shameful, however it doesn't mean that shame must be seen as a point to capitalize on like that.

This article kinda really really reeks of shaming and negativity.

And its got a bit of a forceful tone as well (your inaction makes it your fault! you are telling the big baddy trump that you want to have your stuff closed down, good work!).

I really don't see this being a practical or effective call to action. Encouraging people to speak up about something seen as shameful, seems more useful than shaming people to speak up about something seen as shameful.

(though this is just what I remember from a pewdiepie video on the topic, I may or may not be remembering correctly)

You go and add a feed, and then you don't just get the latest 20 posts. Instead you get all the posts since the beginning of the feed, since google saw it then during a crawl and decided to watch it ever since.

That is something that is a fair bit harder to provide by any competitors

If you have code executing on your machine, you can not control what information that code will take (unless you know that it is 100% safely sandboxed)

And AFAIK, Stallman doesn't spend a lot of time "directly" connected to the wide web, as tracking leads to forcing the user to give information they don't want to give (short random distinct interactions with the internet are fine, as long as they are short enough to not allow for inferences to be made)

However, I do think the current situation is valuable regardless. As long as we have some people on each side, doing whatever they can to attack their enemies with truth.

It might not inform us of how great each candidate is, but will give us a pretty good idea of how bad each candidate is.

- - -

Non-partisan truth finders are obviously better, but only if they are actually non-partisan! People who control the truth without making it obvious they do, I'd find more concerning!

Anti-Hillary has gone about leaking private correspondence and documents to "attack" her

Anti-Trump (which I'm considering Archive to be, considering their prior reactions), has gone about collecting and documenting public data to "attack" him.

As a nice side-effect, it does mean that (for the most part) truth is being used as the weapon of choice, which I think is pretty great. I hope the act of publishing truth as a political tactic becomes more of a thing over time, even if partisan.

Neither side wants to put up any substantial verifiable information about it, so there is nothing to talk about on that front.

A good example to consider is mobile phones and how sharp and precise the UI can be, with lines almost at hair thickness. Anti-aliasing is almost useless on phones already, and its all due to their pixel densities.

(of course, not so useful for 60" screens!)

Incorrect cache hits are fine, as long as there is some checking following the cache hit

    hash(A) == hash(B) && A == B

If I'm not mistaken, it does sound like they were doing some checking after they pulled the generated cert from cache, but it obviously wasn't enough checking

They could just randomly pick anything from the menu, and say it was because of the scan, and it would still have the same PR effect, wouldn't it? (since no one would suspect it of getting it perfectly right in the first place)

https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/ruby-core/ suggests that the main repo is a self-hosted SVN

I kinda feel like the reason for that is more due to the fact that if python users want change in their language, they really need to either construct their own pre-parser and deal with a lot of potential issues, or post a change, hope it becomes a PEP, and hope it gets accepted. There is very little ways other than that

In ruby, you are enabled to fix so much more of the language to your own liking, so there is much less of a need for the main language to change.

I'm not saying that ruby isn't underfunded, just that it doesn't need to grow as fast as python does

    event_datetime in daterange(timedelta(hours=1), before=datetime.now())

    <MayaDT epoch=1481850660.9>

I guess it would help with like, "X happened before Y" situations, but I don't think I'd trust my eyes for that!

I think I would of preferred the "this happened in X month" case instead, I find it easier to trust my eyes for that, instead of trying to look for differing digits!

- - -

UTC default is a godsend though

right?

> not so fast, the spec is still very much work in progress, lots of holes in there... but it's a start, I've put quite some effort in it the past few days

So the title might be worth changing?

Pyston is the only CPython JIT currently however

I know its considered wrong to mess around with the structure, but this is reversible, looks neater, n' can be hidden (after verification) by third party tools with a simple "is this PGP-like, if yes, delete element" instead of mucking around, splitting arbitrary html

    ${message}
    
        ${message sig metadata}
        ${message sig}

> As much as we try to maintain a good relationship with you all, it does get old getting called a pedophile constantly.

constant fighting and complaining with other subs as well (which normally they would just shut down, but (un)fortunately, the r/the_donald mods are doing all they can do prevent that being needed, so its a constant minor (but active) problem, instead of being a large one-time problem that they can just ban)

Its the whole concept of poisoning the well, you have some people acting bad, and then the other people act bad in return, and then everyone watching just feels bad for watching it, and it makes everyone feel shit

OpenPGP works for near anything

that seems like a good way to increase road fatalities

https://i.imgur.com/uUaJEZI.png

if it was done via a VM, people would just mount the VHD, edit the files, and still complain

He ain't writing strict legal discourse, he's writing out his own feelings in the way he feels most enjoyable. Personally I respect that.

For myself: I don't like using words like f*, and I prefer to censor them if I do use them, and I'd rather call someone a goob, instead of an idiot or a moron. My intent isn't to be mean!