There's all kinds of art in it, from initials, technical drawings to art from a torture manual.
301 karma · joined April 12, 2018
There's all kinds of art in it, from initials, technical drawings to art from a torture manual.
The bank I use has a service allowing you to put money in their investment funds, configured for different risk profiles.
You need to pay some fees to opt in. There seems to be an already paid yearly(?) fee when you opt in, but you probably need to pay yearly to keep the money in the system. When you decide to cash out, you have to pay income tax.
In conclusion, from my money, the bank needs to be paid, the state needs to be paid, and I doubt their 6% (assuming this is true) yearly return rate is going to net me anything than a loss unless I pump some 6 digit sum right off the bat and leave it there for decades.
Was it an inside job?
Near my office, kids gather all the time and play music really loudly on small Bluetooth speakers. I don't even dare to imagine the experience if they had one of these bad boys.
In their defense, this is what product owners want. If it didn't work into the numbers, they would stop doing it.
The camp seems to be showing kids that they can do other things than play with their phones, but I don't think outside the premises of the camp they can find people to share similar activities with.
As long as an entity has enough money and a wish, there will be someone willing to grant it.
There is obviously a need for such a product since it's so popular, but it can't be cheap to manage and collect them especially since they're so small.
Basically there's two issues affecting electronic chipsets at high altitude : air density and cosmic rays.
The reduction of the air density can mess with the cooling system.
Cosmic rays contain radioactive particles which can cause soft failures to occur in solid state electronics.
EDIT : Found an interesting paper about it with more details : https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6046/529f05a65e182ac9323ef8...
Also they had a lot of people on payroll to pretend they're available girls on the website, in order to increase engagement and lure subscribers. One of them was a huge biker dude and it was hilarious. The truth is that on all these dating website, as someone else pointed out, the ratio is about 30 guys to 1 gal so building a dating platform is hard.
The difference lies in perception. Or to put it more elegantly, if you like (or at least can tolerate) that specific flavor of Kool-Aid.
For example I was averse to Firefox for a long time because I didn't like the way scrolling pages felt.
It's also about the way in which to split the pie. (how much should go to this creator?)
Or consumer profiling. (It seems our product is enjoyed by men in their mid 40s who like sci-fi)
Or marketing research (it seems our product sells the most in winter).
There's plenty of ways to make use of this data. That's why it's so valuable. It's not uncommon to see 7 digit contracts for high profile news/gossip outlets, for example.
If worst comes to worse, they can just track your behavior on their website alone.
While it's true his own activity isn't worth much, it's still a piece of a very lucrative pie. There are services already oriented specifically around user tracking.
I guess they're oing by the principle of individual behavior is unpredictable, but mass behavior is.
I'd also like to add something that I consider the elephant in the room. Haven't tech companies already proven themselves that they're willing to bend to governments' will in order to do business?
No authoritarian government will welcome Libra with open arms. If the currency won't bend to their will, then they will simply ban it and then it becomes (at best) a black market good.
There's also another issue: how do you value it so that it becomes useful to everyone? If I'm in Venezuela getting paid in bolivars then my money already has no power to begin with.
It will also be hard to manage for a lot of people. I doubt some average Joe in a poor country will want to complicate himself by buying something at 0.0000000231 Libra. It will require a lot of cognitive power to not get scammed.
The print edition is losing money for them and business decided to start giving them away for free to increase brand awareness.
The paywalled stuff is making them modest revenue, definitely not enough to make a living for now but they're still experimenting with the model.
The ads and user tracking is where the real money is. The bidding ad network stuff is okayish, but it seems the big money is in the sponsored articles and in skins (custom stylesheet designed for a specific brand). The former two seem to make even seven digit figures per contract for them.
Looking at the backlog and their style of organizing work you can obviously tell that the users actually visiting the site are treated as second hand citizens while their partners are kings.
This leads me to the conclusion that this is what people might not really want, but it's what they got used to. Finding a sustainable high quality news media business model is an interesting problem worthy of a startup I'd say.
Apples and oranges. You're comparing secular states with religious ones.
>In (as far as I know) no countries would you be killed by atheists if you're non-atheist.
The communist block says hi. China salutes you as well.
[1]https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/h...
Are there any statistics or studies regarding the becoming of these zombies? I thought that the body, if long enough under such medication, becomes incapable of producing its own dopamine, not that the threshold becomes higher.
Apart from the truly severe conditions that prevent individuals from even participating in society, IMHO what psychiatry seems to fail to account for is context. For example, it is said that many people suffer from depression, but instead of looking into the core causes, they would rather just pump patients with meds and hope it gets better with time. Often times though, all that happens is that the patient builds tolerance to medication, so larger and larger doses are needed. It makes me think: what if those people cannot escape their condition to begin with? Can't even know if you don't at least try.
Your statement makes me very curious because as far as I'm aware, key distribution is the core problem of asymmetric cryptography. I can generate a private key and say I'm you, and there's nothing stopping me from doing that.
The only solution I'm aware of so far is DNSSec which starts from the operating system level.