231 karma · joined May 21, 2014
Seriously, looking through the syllabus it is a lot to cover; and if you learn it well through their method (and if employers also believe in it) I can see it might be worth it. But I doubt it. It is a pretty big promise.
I guess it is difficult to describe the steps when there is a major difference between platform methods (windows 7 and Docker Toolbox vs win 10 with Docker).
After that I am up and running. Thanks for the pointer.
C:\Users\kkss\hellonode>docker build -t gcr.io/<HIDDEN>/hello-node:v1 .
An error occurred trying to connect: Post http://%2F%2F.%2Fpipe%2Fdocker_engine/v1.23/build?buildargs=... usetmems=&cpushares=0&dockerfile=Dockerfile&labels=%7B%7D&memory=0&memswap=0&rm=1&shmsize=0&t=gcr.io%2F<HIDDEN>%2Fhello-node%3Av1&ulimits=null: open //./pipe/docker_engine: The system cannot find the file specified.
As long as there is money to be made and jobs to be had, our elected officials will continue to look the other way when it comes to incidents like this.
Security theatre was job one behind the creation of the TSA; job two was a huge employment drive for the people under the auspice of a benevolent organization.
Since these two drivers are so deeply embedded in the duties that government understands as its primary mandates, there is no way they can see any faults in the system.
Also, consider what would happen if we eliminated the TSA
TSA has 62,000 employees and an annual budget in 2013 of $7.9 billion [http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/homeland-security/tsa]
Laying off 62,000 people from the government payroll and eliminating $8 billion in funding would constitute a significant hit on the economy, and practically guarantees you won't be re-elected.
A halfway decent examination should show if it was torn on bitten through... Writing this I realise it must have been bitten through by either external means (animal) or localized (bit off own tongue) or it would have been mentioned as another mystery.
But for me, one thing that is harder to explain is the skull fragment. For that, there would have definitely been tooth or tool marks. Unless of course, she fell....
Eventually someone who wants to be elected will grab on to the idea and make it a tenet of their platform.
This is how anything ends in government that can't be proven (by proven I mean with loss of lives or some other very serious consequence, not simply proven ineffective) to be more harm than good.
A close second job was building a behemoth Government Agency to funnel money, direct contracts (to supporters), and lastly supply jobs for those people who were probably otherwise more difficult to employ.
Now I don't know about you, but I would call that a win-win situation.
Routinely in my job I will produce a free of charge beta for testing purposes before we have price discussions.
I could see that living this way, thinking this way, was of no benefit to me. I saw that I would have much greater benefit by breaking the chain of this behavior, and becoming comfortable in my own skin.
I know that these days, the more common refrain is to 'just be who you are and let the chips fall where they may'. I realized also though the behavior of catering to this desire was self limiting. There are many times in life when you will have to go it alone to be successful.
Just some advice from someone else who solved this differently.
May you have the best of luck, no matter what happens.
Could I use kermit, xmodem, ymodem, zmodem through com 1?
I am sure you put a lot of labor into this project.
You also seeded lots of ideas...
Thank you.
Problems such as being without proper health insurance can cost lives.
I myself have been forgiving in the past about such things; but that attitude was born out of an ignorance I had that everything on the back end was being handled as well as possible. After reading this article I am now much more concerned.
Thank you iStock photo.
http://www.istockphoto.com/video/aerial-bangkok-riverside-do...
In the case of danger/damage to human lives a la direct physical injury, there should be a much higher standard.
It is why there exists murder in the first, second, or third degree; with very different punishments.
There is a 'minimum standard' that must always be followed.
I guess you will disagree, but to compare a programming design error in an antivirus product to the Therac incident falls outside normal deterministic logic, and would make actually my point. As someone who has made software for many years, it is not reasonable to expect a Therac or NASA level of diligence.
This is what courts have upheld as well.
In a perfect world this would never happen...
However we do not live in that perfect world. Far from it.
The reality is all over the world and all of the time, software and a great many other things are designed and sold, and the person who 'knows how it all works' leaves.
New people are hired. Some are good, and some are not. People quit, get illnesses, even die, and life goes on.
When you solve ALL of those possible issues, then you can beat that drum all you want. Until then though, this comment is petty at best...
Thanks for the background info.
But if I had more time I would share a bit of my stories. Trust though that these types of personalities are unfortunately very real.
I try to remember that for every bit of effort and skill I put into my job doing technical tasks, someone else is probably putting just as much into using their personality to get what they want. It's just inevitable...
When the attacker submitted sequence numbers that were not correct for the connection, it would send a TCP reset to both the client and the server; forcing the attacker to begin the attack sequence again with the first SYN. If it recognized a replay (sequence numbers used twice) like would happen here too, it would also reset the session. There are others as well such as packet data enforcement (if the packet data portions did not match up to a valid session) and session proxying too.
Lastly, it would lock out that attacker as a DDOS based on the traffic patterns (TCP sliding windows have been exceeded, or too much data in one direction and nothing returned).
The idea during design was that there are insecurities the TCP protocol inherently permits (like this one), how can we limit those. The answer basically is that if a session displays 'errant but technically permitted by RFC' behaviors, the firewall should force a reset on the connection.
If your conclusion at this point is can't this block valid traffic, the answer is yes it can, and these features are often turned off or limited for that reason.
Be aware that I have not pieced this together completely - it would take more detailed research and time to provide valid evidence - this is just off the top of my head over few minutes.
HTH...
"Sorry. Error occurred. We are already working on it - SQLSTATE[28000] [1045] Access denied for user 'rollio'@'localhost' (using password: YES)"
"Asking around, people assume the TCP handshake verifies the IP addresses on both sides."
Not true - in firewall and security circles this was long ago observed and addressed in many different ways - it is now standard in at least the major Enterprise Firewall Vendors.
Still though; the analysis is good, and clearly determined through work, observation, and sound logic. I would work alongside a person like this anytime.
If the author can find a venue to assert his findings he/she should, but I wouldn't expend too much time on it.
Yes everyone is going to run around and scream 'security!!' when they realize how ridiculously trivial this process always has been, but it does not change facts - it has always been this easy, but this is a new way to highlight that fact.