Same for me, completely unrelatable.
I know this is a bit of a bubble but all my friends that have androids have them rooted, so paying with our phones isn't even an option.
572 karma · joined March 1, 2017
I know this is a bit of a bubble but all my friends that have androids have them rooted, so paying with our phones isn't even an option.
Anyways, I would love to go but Vegas tends to be expensive. Looks like there are no plans to do a livestream/virtual event along side the event. Are y'all at least going to record your sessions and upload them on youtube later?
Does this mean my pixel 4a battery was unaffected for some reason... or simply that the lawyers managed to weasel out of paying 100% of active pixel 4a owners back and my phone is still dangerous or degraded? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It'll be interested to see where D1s performance falls after these reaches general availability.
Also I've had really good luck with the CF discord for support, certainly better than CF tickets or the forums. I tend to only go to support with really weird/novel scenarios, so on tickets I end up banging my head against the wall with a tier 1 support staff for a couple of weeks before I have any chance of a real answer. But on the discord I often get an answer from an actual expert within a day.
Read replicas for lower latency and sessions for partitions per user like you mention.
Def use the mic with a pair of wired headphones/earbuds to use the live/direct monitoring feature.
My team used to have a lot of issues with people mics being too loud or too quiet without realizing. Getting everyone on that mic and specifically using direct monitoring has solved that issue.
It muddies what would otherwise an easy upsell/upgrade.
Does this mean my pixel 4a battery was unaffected for some reason... or simply that the lawyers managed to weasel out of paying 100% of active pixel 4a owners back and my phone is still dangerous or degraded? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The reason they are banned on X is because they annoyed emperor Elon, nothing to do with TOS violations.
As for the why, 2600 says: "Our very first issue in 1984 contained a list of govt employees. This is the kind of thing we do."
1 persons "web browsing" is no browser extensions, a couple of gmail tabs, some light blog reading, and maybe something as heavy as reddit.
While another persons "web browsing" is running multiple browser extensions like grammerly, adblocker, etc. Along with a bunch of gmail tabs, plus a bunch of heavy "web apps"(think: miro, monday.com, google workspace/office365, photoshop online) and then throw 10s-100s of tabs of "research" on top of that.
8gb is quickly becoming unworkable for people that fall closer to the latter group.
But also apples upcharge on RAM is disgusting, so it's hard to blame them for picking the lowest spec model.
When normal users are thinking "faster" they are really thinking about snappiness/responsiveness, not number crunching.
I’ve gone through many of those same steps back when my company was in a rapid growth phase. I believed I was being helpful by stepping back and staying less opinionated, but after a year, I found that most new team members had no real opinion of me—or worse, they’d constructed misguided opinions out of thin air.
Back to the articles point, ultimately people who feel personally offended or “attacked” by a simple statement like “We suck at that” will inevitably create problems. Our company decided that wasn’t the kind of culture we wanted to build, so we chose to move away from (or avoid hiring) those who couldn’t handle that straightforward level of honesty.
Feels like a stab in the back.
Everyone back in the day was clearly aware that pleather meant it was gonna be some shitty inferior product. While the exact same stuff called "vegan leather" manages to be marketed as a premium product and successfully tricks people.
We are starting to pay the price for basic entry level cars that was what a luxury car went for just a decade ago. Yet somehow the materials the car is made out of is universally worse.
iOS apps on f-droid, huh?
Their idea of "working with" the people impacted by this change is just give them a couple of days notice that they are about to be fucked over.
Also the whole "it's just a beta" is such a stupid point I don't even want to respond to it. Truly idiotic.
They are positioning themselves to build a proper walled garden.
That entire blog post could be sumed up as "We know we are doing a shit thing but We. Don't. Care. So it would be great if y'all could just shut up about it until it's more ready."
Any person that has ever gotten a security clearance has given up some of their first amendment rights to do it and if they talk about the wrong thing to the wrong person they will absolutely go to jail.
And as always the classic example of free speech being limited still stands. Go yell FIRE in a crowded movie and see how your dumbass 1st amendment argument keeps you out of jail.
Nothing but lazy disingenuous arguments who's only purpose is to bait conversations for replying with even lazier whataboutisms.
Either the brainrot has really set in for these people or we are being flooded with ai/bots.
When a driver is speeding up to "make" a yellow light their attention turns to nothing but the yellow light or even worse the state of the next intersection/light beyond the one they are speeding through. The existence of the green/yellow light gives drivers carte blanche to not need to think about the current state of the crossing because "the light tells me there should be nothing there anyways".
Where as a driver slowing down to "roll" a stop sign has their attention set to basically the opposite. They are generally focused on things like, is there a car I'm going to hit? is there a pedestrian crossing? is there a cop down the street waiting to give me a ticket?
Also he didn't shut down the sustainability team because he "didn't know about it". He shut it down because their stated goals are a threat to Mullenwegs dictatorship hold over wordpress.
Can wireguard be used for a multi-wan setup/speed aggregation?
And they are right because their recommendations about handling a reject policy are idiotic.
Orgs want a real reject policy, full stop. If we wanted our email to be quarantined... We would fucking set it a quarantine.
This is seriously one of the stupidest things I've read, in a spec, in a long time. It's right up there with whatever dumbass decided BIMI VMCs must not be used for reputation.
VMCs require a verification of personhood, trademark, and a non trivial momentary investment. But why use this reputation being served up on a silver platter to email providers when we can instead keep using our blackbox of IP reputation that already hasn't been working well for a decade.
It seems like changes for changes sake and solves practically nothing DMARC actually needs fixed.
> Since most organisations are going to use p=reject anyway, a provision for receiving mail servers was added, so that an email isn’t rejected and instead only quarantined if there are signs that the message was forwarded or is coming from a mailing list.
Are you fucking kidding me?
Also the mailing list I spoke of are basically dead at this point as the number of invested server admins has dwindled.
Still though even today I can open up TF2 and still have a few favorited servers that have been going for a decade+. I can join those servers and play bot and cheater free for the most part.