248 karma · joined August 31, 2022
I've used other tools in the Simple suite and I love them.
Although I like using F-Droid, this app is also available on the regular Play Store as well.
This guy has every right to shout his opinion into the void. That's the double-edged blade of Twitter. But trying to claim your opinion is objective fact by saying "it's science" like Ron Burgundy makes him look awfully dishonest.
I know that's what he's doing because you can't bullshit a bullshitter. I used to do this same nonsense when I was in middle school and I thought I was smarter than everyone else. But I grew up.
We had to stick a big blob of solder in the hole.
What an amazing world we live in where we can design PCBs and get them professionally produced for a pittance. When I was in high school, we were taught how to make PCBs using the old masking and acid etching method. We drew our traces by hand and drilled our own vias. And that was only ~15 years ago! What a magical world we live in!
It got me to wondering why old architectures that were consumer-targeted aren't also emulated for much more than nostalgic gamers and the niche who swear WordPerfect was the peak of word processors.
My theory is that, for the most part, consumer hardware for small businesses and home offices ran consumer software. If my Apple II running VisiCalc dies and my business runs on it, I'm probably going to adopt Windows and Excel instead of trying to run VisiCalc in an emulator.
With large businesses running COBOL apps on mainframes, that software is probably highly customized to their business and their workflow. It's probably cheaper to buy a license for an official emulator rather than trying to port or rewrite the software.
Although, a part of me thinks it would be cool to run a web server on a blindingly fast, emulated Commodore 64.
Can I get this on a t-shirt? I have no idea what it means, but it sounds amazing.
I just don't have the personal fortitude to attempt something so grandiose. Seems like a fool's errand.
Also, keep in mind there's not just one multiocular O. There's a bunch with varying numbers of eyes.