1,098 karma · joined May 1, 2014
GitHub: https://github.com/StanAngeloff | Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@stanangeloff | LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stanangeloff/ | X: https://x.com/StanAngeloff | Blog: https://blog.angeloff.name
Okay, the other day it was Claude across providers, today it's v0.dev. AI has become so integrated in my personal flow that an outage literally causes me great anxiety. I hadn't realised how dependant on our new AI overlords I've become.
EDIT: re-opened https://status.anthropic.com/incidents/3j3zbrx1cfbt
Still occurring in Europe despite being marked as resolved. There was a brief period where things stabilised, we are back to intermittent `{"type":"error","error":{"type":"overloaded_error","message":"Overloaded"}}` responses.
It seems like every few months there's a new announcement about some API or feature being deprecated, replaced, or fundamentally altered. From the retirement of the Ruby Script Editor to the overhaul of checkout customizations, from the introduction of Shopify Functions (with Rust, no less) to the constant evolution of APIs, it's becoming difficult to keep up without dedicating significant resources to simply maintaining existing functionality.
This latest move to make GraphQL mandatory for new apps by 2025 is just another step in a pattern that's becoming all too familiar. While I understand the desire to push forward with newer technologies, there's something to be said for stability and backwards compatibility. The lack of a proper LTS strategy for their GraphQL APIs means that what works today might be completely obsolete in just a couple of years, which is a tough pill to swallow for businesses trying to plan for the long term.
Add to this the recent price hikes, the restrictions on existing features like reducing the number of markets across plans, and the constant pressure to adapt to new paradigms, and it starts to feel like Shopify is prioritizing rapid change over the needs of its developer ecosystem. It's exhausting to constantly be playing catch-up, especially when these changes often don't bring immediate tangible benefits to our end users.
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate Shopify's drive for innovation. But at some point, one has to wonder if the pace of change is actually hindering rather than helping the platform's growth and stability. It would be refreshing to see a more measured approach that balances forward momentum with the practical realities of maintaining complex e-commerce systems.
[0]: https://finance.yahoo.com/m/b15fb91a-1e90-3259-844e-cfdb2563...
These days I use https://github.com/gsamokovarov/jump which I've mapped to `z`. Happy days.
As a company we are currently shifting to Otter.ai[1] which gives good enough results for everyday meetings.
[0]: https://gist.github.com/StanAngeloff/91480fac18a74d8aff3e4cf... [1]: https://otter.ai/
I suspect there is some underlying issue with these high-latency / low-bandwidth solutions that just makes them impractical in real life.
SendGrid started off similarly, very early on it was named smtpapi.com. The focus was on the API, developers, UX, etc. I keep getting reach out emails from Twilio these days trying to upsell me on all the amazing "new" SendGrid features they have in 2022 (of which I need exactly none).
I don't have high hopes for Postmark's acquisition. ActiveCampaign will start "integrating", then comes the raft of new features, products, solutions. Today's Postmark does very little of what the competition tries to offer. At some point I'm already preparing myself for the inevitable price change ^^.
All in all, good pay day for the founders after 12 years of bootstrapping, not much to celebrate as a customer.
It does, indeed. It does also remind me of GitLab and their quest for finding the best navigation [1]. It was every few versions that the nav kept changing... from horizontal to vertical to fly out to top/side, etc. Looked like bikeshedding on the outside as it seemed to be easier to iterate over the design of the product rather than the actual product. Ultimately what their UX team settled on has been pretty stable for a while.
[1] https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/07/31/navigation-state-of...
Wait, this sounds like redesign for redesign's sake?
> Coming soon: MDN Plus [..] In the coming months, we’ll be expanding MDN to include a premium subscription service based on the feedback we received from web developers > Support MDN and make it your own. For just $5 a month.
Ah, this makes sense now. It looks like MDN is trying to rebrand and reposition itself as a subscription service going forward.
I remain optimistic, it's been a great resource over the years.
[ ] Do a Twitter search [ ] Scan through HN [ ] Check with peers [ ] Consult downdetector.com
…in this order. Do not bother with official status pages.
$ type :
: is a shell builtinCommercial fusion energry, always 5-10 years away.
[1] https://github.com/StanAngeloff/komodo-html-toolkit [2] https://github.com/StanAngeloff/komodo-fuzzy-open [3] https://github.com/StanAngeloff/komodo-aero-theme
I am most definitely not the target audience of VS Online, which is perfectly fine. Someone out there needs this for it to have been built by MS.
[1] How safe are my projects and what guarantees do I get that my work won't be lost?
[2] For cloud-hosted environments, each environment instance is billed based on the number of consumed “environment units”, which are calculated according to an environment’s instance size, the total time the environment is active (i.e. a user is connected to it via the browser-based editor or via a client such as Visual Studio Code) and the total lifetime of the environment (base units).