381 karma · joined June 27, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frYWTrEfPRs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKaVQ5Tt_Zk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zci_6AOCAo
"I have a different take on that. Yes, a lot of people were dissing tunnels yesterday. I'm actually a big fan of tunnels. I think the way the IPv4 Internet was built originally was basically by tunneling over the phone system. Ignore, you know, getting leased lines, putting computers on the end, building a network with no cooperation at all from the phone company. In fact, I once saw a phone company memo that referred to the Internet as a 'hostile overlay'. You know, and we basically, you know, demolished their billing plans and everything, and built this network in spite of the desires of the carriers. And, as I see the IPv4 Internet getting more and more like the phone company, I thought one way to deploy IPv6 is basically tunnel over all that junk. Iterate the same thing again. And I gather, you know, some people, you know, who are concerned about this are looking at other ways of sort evolving the Internet, where you, you know, tunnel over HTTP or whatever you have to do to basically get over all that cruft and build a new network on top of it. So that, to me, was one possible way, you know, as the IPv4 Internet rotted the underneath. We would tunnel over it and then we would throw away the rotted bits and replace them with wires."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/msg/991b9116ffa83...
Dennis Ritchie spend part of that time fighting against the introduction of several new features he felt were not the proper future of the language. Unfortunately, he had little to no involvement on the C99 standardization process. The final outcome was a butchered language. I'm sticking to C89/C90 on all my C development, no matter what.
"I was satisfied with the 1989/1990 ANSI/ISO standard. The new C99 standard is much bulkier, and though the committee has signaled that much of their time was spent in resisting feature-suggestions, there are still plenty of accepted ones to digest. I certainly don't desire additional ones, and the most obvious reaction is that I wish they had resisted more firmly." --dmr
"Bicycle Rush Hour Utrecht (Netherlands) III" -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-AbPav5E5M
"Preliminary Relase of UNIX Implentation Document" -> http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/2006-April/001367.html
The files -> http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/bellLabs/unix/
For as strange as it may sound, this amazing finding went unnoticed for 2 years. Nobody paid any attention to this precious paper...until April 2008. That's when the whole restoration process really started:
"Whence 1st Edition Unix Kernel Assembly?" -> http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/2008-April/001695.html
There was a mailing list specially dedicated to the whole restauration process:
"The Unix-jun72 Archives" -> http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/unix-jun72/
It was really an impressive effort for bringing back to life the first edition of the operating system that forever changed the computer world.