77 karma · joined December 21, 2010
It's a great idea, and a great implementation, but it has no affordance whatsoever to promote discovery.
Dustin is often quite cocky, but I don't wish this kind of mindless copying on anyone.
Online is a great place to learn, but it's absolutely the wrong place to learn the exact same curriculum as offline.
What you're describing is a proper non-sequitur, why would a government's utility inform its credibility as an arbiter of respectability?
Don't even get me started on that atrocious "we don't need to see this" line of argumentation. If the Google+ is going to censor (let's call things by their proper names) pictures that "people don't need to see", where's the goddamned line?
Imbecile.
That such a poorly constructed argument makes its way to the Hacker News homepage is worrisome. I had the hope that people who use logic for a living would have higher standards.
They have indeed been crippling for front-end development, and majorly under-reported since this summer. So if you're facing any of these issues, please participate in the GitHub Issues threads I linked above and help the relevant teams diagnose/improve the problems.
What is your purpose?
It's all about expressive code. There's nothing of value in a closing tag. Nothing. No information than cannot be carried with pithy indentation.
And as others explained well, Haml when used in conjunction with scripting languages encourages the removal of controller and model logic from the view layer.
It doesn't try to add anything else to HTML because what the hell would it add? HTML doesn't have lexical scope issues to fix. I can't believe this shoddy piece is blaming a simple tool for simply doing its simple but useful task.
You're welcome.
It's interesting nonetheless.
I'll be eagerly waiting for this service to make it to Florida. Good luck guys.
Looks like government can't scale.
Definitely trickier than Rails for Zombies for people how have used Rails before but much more rewarding.