1,338 karma · joined January 24, 2021
I read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC and it seems to me like a plain reading of the first amendment supports CU’s position.
Wouldn’t the opposing view imply that you are allowed to have political opinions, but only as long as you go at it alone and don’t organize too much with others?
For all I know that might indeed be a better way of running society, but that’s definitely going to take a big constitutional amendment.
I’m sure many young people feel the exact opposite.
> Turkey.
That would only work as a gotcha if DHH was in fact xenophobic.
I can look at someone’s finished pivot table and reproduce it from the data through other means, but any explanation of what a pivot table actually is and does reads like pure gibberish to me.
Instead it was gatekept for grifters in order to separate gullible teenagers from their allowance.
I think where Agile goes wrong is people thinking that you don't need someone who is actually experienced and good at writing software like this (like Atkinson), you can just pick a random individual off the streets who a lot of the time can't even code, and have them take a theoretical course about writing software like this.
What’s the scenario, someone has launched an elaborate ARP cache attack in order to MITM a website about roads on Hawaii in order to get you mildly lost so that you have to pull over and look at Google Maps for directions, costing you an extra minute of travel time?
When I first had the idea there was still a gap in the way in Southeast Asia, but it looks like it may have been closed now: https://www.seat61.com/map-of-train-routes-in-southeast-asia...
I ended up making it an icosahedron and recursively subdividing each face into four new ones by inscribing a new triangle. The project went nowhere for different reasons, so I never figured out if it would have worked, and given this isn’t one of the examples I suspect it wouldn’t have.
As long as the algorithmic complexity of food logistics is O(n) or better with respect to population size, I guess.
Isn’t it rather pro-intellectual to found universities like that of Bologna in 1088 and pour massive amounts of resources into research to ensure we eventually get to the level of obstetric medicine that we have?
And isn’t it on the contrary intellectually lazy to throw your hands up and declare life to be disposable simply because you don’t know how to treat and prevent diseases and can’t be bothered to figure out how?
Once a company grows beyond a certain point it no longer needs to keep a razor focus on the core business, and a disproportionate amount of effort gets redirected to creating sometimes useful but often completely pointless and gratuitous internal tools. That way every middle manager gets to justify an ever growing number of reports and make his mark in the organization.
Most of what it does is run programs with various cgroups and namespaces, which is what systemd does, so should it really be any more resource intensive?
My point is that you have to distinguish between arguing against the output of the intellectual activity and arguing against the intellectual activity taking place.
So really a case of not enough bureaucracy rather than too much.
It’s not as if they’re going to leave early in the stay and go back to Europe or North America, because of the sunk cost fallacy.