1,731 karma · joined March 30, 2011
They do, though. The premise is simply wrong here.
That may have been true at one time, but I'm not so sure it is any more.
Actually, given what we've seen with Tesla, it will come with a host of promised benefits, which will be delivered over a randomish period of time, but which you will pay for as if they existed all along.
They wouldn't have to understand any of it, just be able to identify where and when changes occurred, for later review for any last minute shenanigans.
I'm not personally convinced this whole incident even happened, but if it did, this is what I think would make sense.
It's more accurate to say Musk didn't want to buy Twitter for $44 billion. His timing on his bid really sucked. He might have saved half or more if he'd waited a few months.
In the medium term, Twitter might be the best place to train models on the zeitgeist of the moment. For whatever reason you'd want to do that.
My personal fanfic for neuralink is that it's the reason the Tesla bot has human like hands.
For example, I'm pretty sure this is why some models turn up a near exact version of The Girl With The Pearl Earring.
I'd wait and see what happens with the new ownership.
In my utopia, the end results are models containing the sum total of human output, available to everyone.
What I think is unconscionable is training the models on public works and then retaining them exclusively for private use.
What HN needs is less engagement with useless, time consuming misinformation, and more outright rejection of it.
And Meta will end up using as a tool to promote metaverse interactions.