Tomte

I suffix everything with "Reply in English", and even so I‘m getting lots of Chinese.

And if you expand the acronym EULA you will actually find that it is… a license agreement.

Of course it isn‘t.

> In the actual candy study, the participants were all students, status was manipulated in the lab by telling some students they were better than others, and "nearly twice" means 1 piece vs 2 pieces.

> oh and the researchers told participants they could take some candy. There was no stealing!

“It’s not novel”.

Apart from a quite a few museums having his machines (or replicas).

So let me ask for once: what am I missing? Why is that interesting and not trite?

That‘s fine, but I would have appreciated notices, which proofs and theorems do not hold in the general case.

It‘s an exercise for the reader.

Of course several people wrote different position statements to vote on.

Did you expect one Debian developer to cook up half a dozen possible stances he is not even personally invested in? Are you constantly surprised that election programs of different parties are worded differently (and use different fonts)?

What I don‘t have compared to sbx is an outbound firewall, but my VM does not have any personal/interesting data, only a vanilla Fedora installation and the project dir with open source code, so I do not care much about exfiltration.

They are „advertised“ by hanging a broom outside (Besen is broom).

You tend to go visit a few over an afternoon, because they concentrate on certain wine-making towns.