VMG

Maybe I have this wrong, but I believe the difference is that you can create an Io instance in a function that has none

The name is weird

> This ought to be automated using AI.

...

> I'm not trying to say that this is now projects ought to work right now.

which is it?

I mean this with all sincerity, try doing this yourself.

The established projects are resistant to YOLOing their projects and running them on complete LLM autopilot.

You are proposing a completely different development style.

Fork Ocaml to Oca-LLM and Julia to Jul-AI and see how it goes.

I've seen this in other places as well.

The bottleneck is not coding or creating a PR, the bottleneck is the review.

"Make product worse, get money"?

https://dynomight.net/worse/

ML/AI is much less stochastic than an average human

your browser is processing my comment

not necessarily, by default `Result` does not even carry a stack trace

Propagating upwards a valid way of handling it and often the correct answer.

There needs to be something at the top level that can handle a crashing process.

I did not until now

infohazard!

I am eternally grateful for the SGU.

Our escape to reality indeed

The "References" section of the XML spec is almost longer than the JSON spec itself

> [...] serious XML implementation [...]

You are cherry-picking here

> by the time you've written a JSON parser that beats that you could've equally produced an equally improved XML system while retaining the much greater functionality it already had.

Here is where you lose me

The JSON spec fits on two screen pages https://www.json.org/json-en.html

The XML spec is a book https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/

> Some controllers are originally painted with a rubber-like cover that, unfortunately, degrades with time and becomes a sticky gooey. I usually deal with it with the help of Methanol. It nicely removes it.

I have some products like that and I despise them. Maybe I should try methanol.

Perfect. This is why I visit this website

Isn't that what thinking mode is?

What do you mean by "support"?

This is hilarious, I have almost exactly the same prompts. Why are the LLMs so afraid of breaking changes and propagating exceptions?

There is a giant orb in the sky that emits UV and has for billions of years.

I think the microbes are still trying to figure this one out.

The problem here is that there might be a bug fix or even security fix that is not backported to old versions, and you suddenly have to update to a much newer version in a short time

naive question: isn't fiber optic cables for communication a counter-example to your thesis?

> It configured also non-existent drivers, and for some reason it enabled monkey test support (but not test support).

If it doesn't have the underlying base data, it tends to hallucinates. (It's getting a bit difficult to tell when it has underlying data, because some models autonomously search the web). The models are good at transforming data however, so give it access to whatever data it needs.

Also let it work in a feedback loop: tell it to compile and fix the compile errors. You have to monitor it because it will sometimes just silence warnings and use invalid casts.

> What am I doing wrong? Or is this really the state of the art?

It may sound silly, but it's simply not good at 2D

crawlers can run JS, and also invest into running the Proof-Of-JS better than you can

I just tried this

> Me: why is madrid the capital of france?

> ChatGPT: It's not. Madrid is the capital of Spain. The capital of France is Paris.

14:00 is a Schelling point

related: googles song detection alg detects my phone vibrating as the song "Montagem Dilatação Hipnótica"

> 3. Data while processing is un-encrypted, as code need to 'see' the data

read the article again

Don't feel bad. I sold my coins and now I'm glad I don't have the headache of securing it now.

Unfortunately she is not contributing much to the discourse either. She just wants it to shift to the topics she cares about.