Career wise? Software engineering, 100%. That's not going away, and this is an industry that mostly does still care about university degrees (though I'm sure you could self-study, build a small portfolio and go that route and have success).
I'm with you on this (Australian here), but the difference is in the US the police basically need to be prepared for any issue to escalate due to the US being an insane dystopia.
Yep, log onto govt website, check what they've prefilled (based on reporting requirements by your employer, which covers the vast majority of people), put in any deductions, submit. I was shocked to learn this isn't the norm.
I think this is only true of the lower end where poorly performing companies are looking to hire poorly performing (or junior) devs, where they care more about bums in seats than actual productivity per person.
More of a legacy code thing, but in my experience a lot of devs will race towards labelling legacy code as "bad" code because it doesn't meet some superficial standard. If I had a dollar for everytime I heard this from a dev as they start discovery on some new feature or necessary refactor, only for them to come back and say they realised there's a good reason the legacy code is the way it is. I was certainly guilty of this too when I was a junior/mid.
So I guess just ignore all the people getting real value out of ChatGPT/etc? How can you compare that to crypto at all with a straight face. Yes, you need to be an expert to validate the output. Welcome to being an expert using any tool.
Time for everyone to overreact and let the culture war theatrics disguise politicians' dismal care for the systems they're actually supposed to be running. If you're finding yourself enraged over this, you need to question your priorities and if the people driving this content have your interests at heart. Spoilers; they don't.
I still don't really understand the concern here. You can get it to generate foul material if you ask for it; I'm sure most humans would oblige you if you asked them to do that too, which while may colour your opinion of them as they capably respond under a direction like "reply in a way that ignores your moral beliefs" or "reply as if you were the devil", does not actually indicate anything about their actual moral standing. I'm not saying ChatGPT is moral, but it doesn't seem to emit foul material unless you explicitly ask.
The worrying examples that I've not seen come up is it generating that content with an innocent prompt.
Employee here, I really enjoyed full remote work during the pandemic, but I have to admit after 6 months I started to feel pretty lonely. I think for mental health reasons employees should be encouraged to at least do hybrid, but I do expect my workplace to also provide flexibility to suit everyone's needs. If I had kids I'd probably try to be remote as possible.
I can't quite articulate what it is, but there's a certain "glimmer" when his head turns a few times, but other than that this is shockingly convincing. If I wasn't primed to expect a deepfake I'd probably not even notice or question it.
I think they make sense if used correctly; the act of toggling immediately changes the state of the app to match the state of the toggle. If you're tracking a dirty state and the action doesn't occur until a Save/etc button is clicked, it should be a checkbox.