1,857 karma · joined June 5, 2021
It was the interview equivalent of the multi-headed dragon meme, where the last one looks absolutely stupid. The contrast was insane, microsoft was an absolute shit show compared to the other two companies in terms of talent, personality, organization and more.
But where the hell have they been, as other athletic companies have taken off with better synthetic fabric, nike hasn't increased in quality. Their marketing is particularly weird, making some interesting choices.
All in all, it seems the company has been badly run the last ten years.
I think shock news and outrage was a thing since TV...
Feeling 'righteously angry' has always been popular.
No they did not. Dario has repeatedly stated if they stopped training new models, they would be very profitable.
Schwab?
I have a non profit insurance and most of the hospitals in my area are non-profit as well. Some of the parts of the system are for profit (maybe the imaging centers?, pharma companies), but most of it isn't... that doesn't seem to be the main issue.
One answer is they're quite good at poaching talent.
Managers may or may not run daily or weekly 'check-ins' (I've never been on a team that did daily ones), there were no points assigned, there were very rough guesse of how long projects would take, but management just assumed people didn't need babysitting and people would work hard when necessary to unblock other folks.
Android
Youtube
Waymo
Chrome
Workspace
GCP
>Which amazing developer tools from Google do you use regularly?
Kubernetes
Jax
Tensorflow
gRPC
Go
Istio
this isn't really true though, if you look at survival rates of many diseases.
I have to assume they aren't the only employer to do this, so I think job openings are meaningless here.
Maybe this isn't the same as the eight figure comp they'd get at Meta when they did their hiring spree, but no one thinks that's sustainable.
this is false, it's very good at internal tooling.