Slightly off topic, but what are the things that have gotten much worse?
1,427 karma · joined March 24, 2011
Slightly off topic, but what are the things that have gotten much worse?
They preference all 100+ rankings, but do it by groups (generally). i.e. Party A will preference Party B candidates, then Party C. Though some smaller parties do very individual preferences.
There are meal replacement shakes on the market already. There is fast food (cheap!) there are hot dog stands...
I'm not sure where your position comes from.
Yeah they are controlling other countries elections instead. Great high moral ground there ;)
Here I was thinking it was "World War II" not "America saves the world II".
> freeing Asia from Imperial Japan
Yeah Russia had NOTHING to do with that one (except for pushing them out of china, and being as pivotal as the US bombing of Japan in it's ultimate surrender).
> freeing Eastern Europe from communism
Because communist are evil and all that other crap US propaganda teaches us.
> It played a huge role in reconstructing Europe after WWII and I guess the same is true of Japan.
Well yeah, it played a huge role in destroying them as well...
Any more cherry picking you'd like to ad to that list? Invented freedom perhaps?
Sure, if you ignore the secret courts and global spying, that no one seems to be able to challenge in "functioning system".
If you push an update, I can buy that as well on amazon (and still only spend $14.40 total)...
EDIT:
1/3rd of the product? do you mean there is only 1/3rd of the book? or are you referring to the formats? That is an odd way to describe the product. I would say the product is your knowledge, not the paper/format it is produced in.
If he/she doesn't like amazon's price... then don't sell on amazon.
Equivalent to saying: "Please give me more money... because that way i get more money"
I find it difficult to see how this could ever be unethical (given the status quo).
But as a counter point... We don't know this was a 'general purpose' problem... so your point isn't even valid even if you were responding to something I said... Unfortunate.
I don't understand the "viable alternative" arguement. You are saying "I won't vote for who I really want to vote, because they'll never win, because everyone else won't vote for them" <--- Is that what you mean? That seems self defeating.
...
Turns 50 lines (if you're lucky) of JS into 0. (with about 10 characters more markup).
There is not too much to either of these frameworks. A solid day and you'll be productive. There are many layers to becoming an expert, but (at least with angular) you can just use the bits you know, and refactor as you learn more.
i.e. You don't have to know anything about what "directives" are to build an app
I think people just some time like a sea change, and look for an excuse.
No one has tested this form. So just putting it down seems premature.
I'd prefer people to be data driven, than just cargo culters.
Do you have any data that backs that up? (excluding call-to-authority and anec-data)
Oh that's right, Apple are American, not Korean... americans are never evil, and always full of integrity. .... But those Koreans!
Why don't we just stop pretending any of these companies have 'integrity' and admit they are just cold businesses competing for money... they are not people with moral codes. They are capitalist entities looking for $$$.
Or are we talking about using Copyright to be limited to geographic location? (i.e your U.S Licensed Photoshop can't be used in Australia)... Because that would be a serious misuse of laws. (in my opinion)
What are you refering to?
{'enemy?' => 'attack',
'captive?' => 'rescue'
}.each { |test, response| self.send(response) and break if warrior.feel.send(test) }The argument remains the same, I drew a parallel with a current situation to highlight how ridiculous it was to blame the Taliban for 9/11 (as they had NOTHING to do with it). Just as Russia had nothing to do with Snowden (except that he's there).
Firing missiles on civilians, or "combatants" that aren't engaged in any conflict with you is a war crime.
Would you accept this, if the US fired a missile into a Canadian cafe because they thought a terrorist was in there and everyone around him must ALSO be a terrorist (and thus an enemy combatant)?
Harbouring criminals is a reason to declare war?