1,427 karma · joined March 24, 2011
Arguing they have only themselves to rely on, feels like a rationalisation to not help them.
You can, and a lot of people are buddhist in china without any interference from the state.
> It's questionable how much Marxism actually existed from the beginning. I don't think that Marx envisioned famines starving the poor in his "worker's paradise."
That's like saying "It's questionable how democractic USA is/was given they had slavery."
And to nitpick, they starved the rich as well ;-) (which is a bit more marxist)
The US has been doing some pretty insane things... Yes they haven't Nuked half the planet, but that pretty far down the spectrum of 'insane'... Shutting down, or heavily censoring the internet is not...
You do recall what happened to wikileaks in the US, right? Some phone calls, and Amazon shuts their servers down....
How about also have the code on bitbucket (if you want to use flashy web services). Chances of them going down at the same time seems remote.
You'd lose all that from using git? Why? Are you saying if you switched to git without switching any of your svn infastructure? We aren't talking about github downtime anymore are we...
> Size is mentioned as to be honest we moved a load of stuff to git in 2011as a test case and it couldn't handle it.
A repo I interact with daily is now pushing 54gb, it contains large test fixtures that have HD videos, and images in it. I've never had any issues. (It takes a while to copy it around...)
I'm available for consulting if you want this kind of uptime ;-D
Using github as an excuse to stay with svn seems rather ill informed.
You wouldn't lose hours if github is down. You might lose your ability to deploy (if you are deploying from github) but you could setup any other remote you like, and deploy from that.
I'm not sure what the 'size' of your repo has to do with anything...
40 hour work weeks is hardly "Working extremely hard"
i.e Why is China's growth so far outstripping India's given India has more freedom?
I think you vastly underestimate the rule of law in china. This doesn't happen. Nor are general people afraid of it happening. Where are you getting this impression from?
> It seems to me that the chinese state is in a bind similar to that faced by Deng xiaoping - this thing the West does (Capitalism or Internet) is enabling them to charge so economically ahead it is an existential threat not to follow. But if we do follow the party risks losing control.
That was not the bind Deng Xiaoping faced. He took over china right after the cultural revolution which occurred right after the "Great leap forward". He had a floundering nation that he needed to jump start. State controlled capitalism is the answer to that problem, and fits well with the Socialism narrative (i.e building capital, is the first stage before sharing it).
> Deng did take the risk and the loss of control seemed to be offset - however this time the rifts in the party are deeper, the gulf between rich and poor wider.
This again misrepresents the facts. The gap between the Rich and poor, is wider, yes, but the poor are much richer now. The rifts in the party seem MUCH smaller now. China is no where near a "Cultural Revolution" now... that's how bad the rifts were then.
East Germany is NOTHING like modern China, it might have been similar around the cultural revolution, but the Stasi style informing/kidnapping/interrogating was uniquely east germany.
There is no requirement in their api to supply CC details... so no requirement to be PCI.
So it would be weird if they did mention PCI...
The first 6 and the last 4 is not enough to make a valid CC... And if you are still guessing the last details then it's the same as just guessing the full number. (just you'll get their quicker)
That $150/month cost is a cost incurred in the US. It would be a different cost to source the ingredients in every country.
Being able to think outside of the existing paradigm of rights based thinking is not something that is "wrong" it is actually more 'considered' than knee jerk assertions.
> Burnie in the middle of Tasmania going to encourage the creation of technology startups when its users are going to be technologically uneducated in the first place? What will most likely happen is all that bandwidth (paid by taxpayers) will most likely be used for Torrenting music, warez, movies and porn.
I'll paraphrase your words: Poor/socio-economically disadvantaged people don't deserve nice things, because they are too poor to understand them. Politicians are short sighted for ignoring the rich middle class.
You're view point is exactly WHY the NBN should be rolled out.
Australia has 20 million people spread across one of the largest countries in the world, there is not enough market (i.e critical mass) for private firms to build this kind of infrastructure, it is called market failure, it is EXACTLY when government should intervene.
>I'm still not convinced. How is ability of users being able to send each other high-resolution images, HD video etc. going to be worth $50bn+ to economy?
Why was electricity so important just to spread nighttime lighting!? Why'd we even bother!? You don't know that all we will use data for is HD video/image.
Also I think you underestimate how much caching occurs, speeding up local network with speed up "the internet" as ISPs cache a lot.