The idea is that car manufacturers would be able to undercut dealerships on prices and thus bankrupt the dealerships[1].
So it's just classic protectionism. The question why the law should protect entities that everyone hates is the baffling part.
386 karma · joined March 7, 2015
The idea is that car manufacturers would be able to undercut dealerships on prices and thus bankrupt the dealerships[1].
So it's just classic protectionism. The question why the law should protect entities that everyone hates is the baffling part.
There isn't even an attempt to establish any sort of causality here yet the article uses the word 'affects'.
One that is with p > .995 spam for all the viagra pills and lasik and everything.
Another should be for the emails that are probably spam but not certainly.
For the record, I just went over the 151 spam messages I've received over the past 2 weeks and had 0 false positives. That's pretty good.
I can imagine careers like hair dressers, artists, nurses, etc. lasting throughout the singularity even if computers could technically do these jobs as well.