1,052 karma · joined January 5, 2012
That's because that is what on prem means. What you're describing is colocating.
https://www.amazon.com/Dopesplay-Wireless-Portable-Touchscre...
I've had some success searching "lapdock" as well, they're marketed towards using them with smartphones it looks like but can't see why you couldn't plug it into a server or computer as well.
I recommend a Keychron k8 as a good entry point if you like the format, been using it for a few years as my main one at home with a K6+little folding laptop stand for anytime I'm staying out of the house for any extended length of time.
k8 - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08B5WHYTT/ k6 - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07ZT7W5FP
This is a feature of every (non-private at least) forum, it's called the logout button :)
Having done Doordash/Ubereats in the past myself that is ABSOUTELY not the norm, god I wish it was that streamlined. Picking up a single order and delivering it straight to the customer is by far and away the most common scenario for the drivers.
They do have stacked orders which are the multiple pickups you're talking about, but I've never had more than 3 orders "stacked" together, and I would say it's more common to have stacked orders from multiple different restaurants rather than multiple orders from the same restaurant. And from the driver point of view stacks suck because almost always only one order in the stack will have a tip, the others will be no-tip orders they couldn't get someone else to deliver by themselves.
Doordash also recently changed how they pay out on these stacked orders to the drivers detriment. It used to be you'd get the base rate for each order in the stack, so 3 orders stacked together would be the base rate x 3 + whatever tips by each customer, but now they pay them out as one big order no matter how many orders are stacked together, so you get a single count of the base rate even if you're delivering two or more orders in a stack, which again are usually only a single order with a tip, so you're effectively delivering the other orders for free.
Just by living in the US and participating in our modern society here I am myself in a similar situation, and I'm not exactly a political activist dedicating my life to changing the status quo, but if and when the people we're exploiting to fund our current lifestyle start fighting for a better life I'm not gonna be telling them that they need to stop and think about the effect their demands would have on our lives.
I've been renting for the last 10 years, the house I'm in now is estimated to be worth $300,000. My rent payment is 2500.
2500 x 10 x 12 = coincidentally, $300,000 exactly, that I'll never see again.
So someone who owns an equivalent home for the same amount of time, if it were to suddenly have the value plummet to $0, would still come out ahead of me because they'd only be losing the equity they've put into their home. And that's still not a fair comparison, because there's almost no way it'd become utterly worthless, so they'd still be left with something to show for it even if it loses a significant percentage of its value.
Housing is a basic human need for survival, to be 100% honest I don't feel that bad that the people that have been willfully participating in a system that only works by screwing other people over may lose some money when the people getting screwed over have had enough and try to change things.
Plenty of people are already living that reality, it's called renting.
-ChatGPT initially gives the same diagnosis the vets did, Babesiosis
-It notes that Babesiosis may have either been a misdiagnosis or there may be a secondary condition/infection causing the remaining symptoms after the Babesiosis treatment didn't resolve all of them
-It suggests such a hypothetical secondary condition could be IMHA, which the article notes is an extremely common complication of Babesiosis with this specific dog breed
-A quick Google search brings up a fair amount of literature about the association between Babesiosis and IMHA
So in fact this is the opposite of a never before seen situation, ChatGPT was just regurgitating common comorbidities of Babesiosis and the vets in question are terrible at their job.
Verbal abuse and general surliness isn't the only alternative to the false sincerity and you immediately jumping to the opposite end of the spectrum is frankly just arguing in bad faith. It can just be a neutral interaction, you can require your employees to have have common courtesy and be polite without being completely servile and obsequious.
"That'll be 10.97, cash or card?" "Cash, here you go" "2.18 is your change" "Thanks" "No problem"