1 karma · joined August 10, 2026
I'll never understand this line of reasoning. It's completely backwards. Does anyone really think it'd be so easy to borrow money for consumer goods with suspect credit or outlandish business ideas without central banks pumping liquidity into the economy? Anyone looked into savings rates lately? You know, where natural capital formation occurs?
Isn't this exactly what Apple does with its chargers all the time? They change them in the slightest manner in newer generations, so the older generation charger doesn't work with it. I don't think there is an actual legitimate reason to do this - such as improved design or functionality. It doesn't seem to hurt Apple at all though, their hardware is still top notch and above and beyond its competitors.
Planned obsolescence is when you artificially shorten the lifespan of something in order to increase the sales of the product or the next generation of the product in order to generate more revenue.
Your sleep hack is probably less secure. I remember reading somewhere that doing random sleep() calls is flawed and doesn't completely mitigate the attack, but does increase the number of requests needed to get a good statistical analysis.
Google Apps gives you two options to revoke access: suspending a user and deleting a user. If you suspend a user, you can later re-enable that user. In the event of firing an employee, you probably want to go ahead right away and delete the user - upon doing so you will be prompted to transfer any data to another user.
Edit: Perhaps, they should add a checkbox to revoke application-specific passwords in the change password interface.
If you don't want to be a founder, then keep looking.
The solution would be to close that hole, rather than opening the same hole somewhere else. For example, for the username reminder form, if the username can't be found for a given email address, then that can be conveyed to the user by sending them an email message.