895 karma · joined October 30, 2021
For several decades, liberal policies have been driving down the welfare system and the minimum wage. Macron is definitively trying to put a end to the french social welfare system.
Gwynne Shotwell, engineer and COO of SpaceX maybe considered from the job of CEO of Boeing. It seems to me more USA-ish move than nationalize Boeing. Don't know witch one is the best for Boeing in the end.
But without the context it doesn't seem that good, the S24 AI that remove reflections seems better.
So ... since 3.2: https://docs.python.org/3.2/library/stdtypes.html#bytes.deco... In 3.1 it was the default encoding of string (the type str I guess). https://docs.python.org/3.1/library/stdtypes.html#bytes.deco...
But I'm not going to improve it significantly.
Thank you. ^^
Definitively, if you are making a map, your have to make geopolitical chooses. And yes, I have edited NE data to highlight the geopolitical choices that I think are the simplest to defend.
The capital positions are the only data that is not UN sourced nor from natural earth. I will fix that.
- Get the islands back !
- Limit the zoom level to not pass through the land
- Make the Capital city maybe in light bold or slightly bigger to differentiate them
- Fix long name
- Some cities disappear when you zoom.
The name of the countries (and cities) are the official one declared at the UN. So, yeah, the official short version of UK is "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".
From this study, it doesn't seems that speed mater that much here since it was a short conversation with a fixed subject.
You introduce a new variable in the equation. Trust. I think that is justified and its posing a whole set of new questions. I would like to answer them but I can't.
It is also about improving human speech too, what can we do to match AI performance ? I think, that are some very interesting questions that it may helps to answer.
How can we make AI even better at « brainwashing » ? Does the value of information matter ? I mean is it easier to AI to « nullifies conspiracy beliefs » or to « nullifies scientific ones » ? We may have opinions on these issues, but the scientific reality behind them is not obvious. It's so exciting !
It seems solid. But I would like to have the same study with an human conversation instead of an AI one.
It can catch easy one, not the obscures cases.
There is also a power plant there but I guess it will be fine.>
Edit: A lot of the victims are from rock falls. The others part are from falling building. It's really sad.
Same for your example, no logical link between the effect and the consequences.
https://www.cea.fr/english/Pages/News/world-premiere-living-...
Or for French speaking people:
https://www.cea.fr/Pages/actualites/sante-sciences-du-vivant...
The files become big but it just works.
If an alternative is quicker / lighter I will use it but it must just works.
Nice to see that hackernews.com also works. Thank you.