The story exists when somebody looks into it. UnHeard, which is a YouTube channel with 500k followers, found out about this woman because of the viral social media posts, and interviewed her.
What other platform would you prefer to see it on?
103 karma · joined December 3, 2025
The story exists when somebody looks into it. UnHeard, which is a YouTube channel with 500k followers, found out about this woman because of the viral social media posts, and interviewed her.
What other platform would you prefer to see it on?
5B:5C:F6:4A:94:23:7C:D5:F0:E0:85:76:00:38:BC:1C:EB:DF:18:DA:BA:5C:B3:EA:CA:7C:15:9F:22:A7:E2:4B
> company contracts offshore agency
> devs costs drop by 20-40%
> offshore agency grabs any warm body off the street, JS-adjacent experience and minimum English is only requirement
> keeps 40% of the money
> "how many story points for the 360° camera React component, guys?"
> Hayley Hodgson [...] was ordered to go to the facility after a friend of hers tested positive for the virus and she was identified as a “close contact” by the number plate on her scooter.
> spent 14 days at the Howard Springs mandatory Covid-19 quarantine facility
> "Police officers blocked my driveway. ’What’s going on, are you guys testing me for Covid? What’s happening?’ They said, ‘No, you’re getting taken away. And you have no choice. You’re going to Howard Springs. You either come with us now, and we’ll put you in the back of the divvy van. Or you can have a choice to get a Covid cab.’
> they were even threatening me that if I was to do this again, ‘We will extend your time in here.’”
> Ms Hodgson said she told police “I don’t consent to this”, and asked why she couldn’t “just self-isolate at home”. Police responded ‘We’ve just been told from higher up where to take you. And that’s all that there is,’”.
> She was told to pack her bags and that she would be released when she tested negative. During her two-week stay she was tested three times, and each time tested negative.
> The video includes footage filmed by Ms Hodgson during her stay as she argues with a police officer at the facility, who reprimands her for leaving her cabin without a mask and threatens her with a $5000 fine.
> “I’m gonna give you a warning, yeah?” he says to her as she sits on the balcony. “It’s an official warning that you have to stay on your balcony and obey the rules while you’re here.” When she argues with the officer that the rules don’t make sense, he replies that “it doesn’t have to make sense”. [...] “Highly infectious when all of us people are negative?” she asks. “So far. The risk is still very high,” he says.
> She said at one point when she was distressed and asking to be let out of her room to go for a walk or a run, facility staff instead offered her Valium to calm down.
> Ms Hodgson said as a result of her two-week stay she had lost her casual retail job. “They compensated me $1500 for the two weeks, and that was all,” she said. “Now I’m currently unemployed because of this situation”
Full interview with recordings from inside the Australian "internment camp" https://unherd.com/newsroom/inside-australias-covid-internme...
Mirror: https://archive.ph/GQDkN
> The man had been staying at the Intercontinental, in the centre of Perth, until yesterday afternoon before three officers, dressed in Hazmat suits removed him from his room.
https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/illegal-...
Mirror: http://archive.today/ekWBs
Kinda wild to think they haven't fixed it yet. On mobile you cannot zoom in to view their images.
Maybe the site is vibe coded and nobody at Qwen actually knows how to fix it..
Another astonishing UX fail was (still is) on Xiaomi's page[1] - where they try, and successfully fail, to showcase a video editor implemented by their model.
They embed a screen capture hosted on a Chinese hosting site BiliBili, too bad the video is 360p pixel soup.
To be able to change the resolution you are required to:
- know to use desktop view in the browser to make the resolution button show
- know Chinese to understand which button is "resolution" and that you need to login to switch resolution
- have and account with the video hoster or be willing to register
I was curious, but not that curious...
[1] https://mimo.xiaomi.com/mimo-v2-5-pro#AFull-FeaturedVideoEdi...
Parent was just starting a fact of how our digital overlords determine the probability of your browser being a bot. Why take it personal?
According to who?
But now that things are finally turning normal, everybody gets a daily token allowance for GeminiGPT 7.2 and you can even boost your ratio if you volunteer your bioenergy to the local GPT microdatacenter (cycling or run on the H-wheel for an hour gets x1.02 output tokens for the day).
[3] - analysis by a police association of the Refusal of Service https://accademiapolizialocale.wordpress.com/wp-content/uplo...
The first step should be to show them the Privacy Authority press release[1] - "No to preservation of guest ID copies".
You should be prepared to be refused check-in if they're stubborn and feel like you "cause problems". The protection you have is that public service (hotel) is forbidden to refuse service by law[2][3], fine is €516 up to €3098. If it happens you should call police to verbalise and apply the fine. Refusal by police (Rifiuto di atti d'ufficio) is criminal offence and punishable with imprisonment 6mo - 2yr [4].
You should present ID to allow identification. The host must insert, by law at most 24hrs after check-in [5], client data into police portal, like name, DOB, nationality etc.
Everything else is extra and by GDPR you should be informed of any data processing, basis of processing, duration of processing, and your rights.
You can write Garante della Privacy to signal violations of GDPR if you feel it's warranted. I know they're happy to investigate and apply big fines to larger companies, not sure about how they handle smaller companies, like hotels.
1 - https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/d...
2 -
4 - Italian penal code Art. 328 Refusal of office acts https://www.brocardi.it/codice-penale/libro-secondo/titolo-i...
5- Art. 109 TULPS - Identification of guests https://www.brocardi.it/testo-unico-pubblica-sicurezza/titol...
Turns out the local policemen asked verbally to make photocopies, just in case... The hotel is more afraid of the local police than of it's clients, so they just do it.
Since I was the only client who ever asked about it, and gaslighting me wasn't going to work ("everybody does it! what do you have to hide?"), they just gave me the copy to destroy.
Other places copy IDs because they're lazy and don't want to compile the required form on the spot. Not to mention ID photocopies floating around the reception desk in plain sight...
/s
Nothing prevents the ISP from collecting that.