192 karma · joined January 16, 2015
If the art used in a game violates copyright or contains imagery of exploited children, ban it of course, but what does that have to do with whether it was generated via AI or created in another manner?
If anything AI generated art should be _less_ susceptible to copyrighted stuff because everything is original (even if it's not in original style)
Edit: I was wrong, it's topojson as per the other reply, based on the data-type attribute that's set on the div outside the map
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/5/30/1864381...
It looks VERY similar
However, I don't think this works very well on websites where you have to interact to get to other pages.
I just went to Google, searched something, and left a comment on one of the results, but I couldn't view the comment afterwards.
I can imagine many websites that this could be a problem for, such as an authenticated experience or a wizard where the step isn't captured in the URL explicitly.
But I'll keep this in mind for getting feedback on static pages for sure!
myemail+meatshields@gmail.com
The plus sign in gmail allows me to know who sent the email (or who my email was distributed by): https://gmail.googleblog.com/2008/03/2-hidden-ways-to-get-mo...