I like this solution but would latency create issues? You'd only be sending 100ms worth of motion every ~120ms. Would you just drift 200ms behind with every passing second (20ms behind after each 100ms batch)? I think I may be missing something though.
I am curious why you think 'real-time' risk modelling in particular might be deficient? For the record I agree, but my issues are with fintech lenders desire to lend out money too freely (models that are designed to pump lending #'s, not repayment).
He's saying that heels and basketball shoes are great because they do not adhere to minimalism. If they strictly adhered to just doing their job they would be less decorative than they are. We want these objects to also be expressive, and so we design them to be so. He's suggesting this expression is good, and shouldn't be constrained by an adherence to minimalistic design.
2 things come to mind:
1. These target the large majority of people with no will or interest in researching/picking/managing their own ETF investments.
2. Robo advisers re-balance your ETF portfolio (in much the way an individual ETF would).
Why are you so convinced that cryptocurrency solves the "outside forces much larger and more powerful than me have influence over the system" problem? It exchanged a solution to some problems for a new set of problems to be solved.
Rents in Montreal are historically cheaper than other major metros (in Canada). I am currently looking for commercial space in Toronto and despite lots of empty spaces, rates remain high.
I would tend to disagree with this. Facebook's customer is advertisers, which inherently requires scale/ad placements + live auction system + the FB graph matchmaking. I am not familiar with the internals of Uber, but they earn revenue if they can get a rider in a car, pay both parties, and then take a cut.
This might be a dumb question, but wouldn't whoever sold the car/provided financing have the lien on the title? Wouldn't sale/financing be contingent on no other liens on the car/property?
This is actually really great advice - albeit a bit harsh. #2 makes sense, but any advice on solving #1 and #3? Is this yours or did you read about this somewhere?
"At the risk of being helpful, here are some things YOU can do that are actually guaranteed to improve commute times for everyone:
...
2. Don’t let people merge in front of you, ever."
How will the commute times of those who sit there waiting to merge be improved? If traffic flow was heavy enough they would never merge.
Nice! Thanks for sharing this. You should include some more sales anecdotes if you have any to add. They're a really useful way of communicating a sales strategy being applied to a unique scenario.
Very strange indeed - people don't take legal action lightly. I don't understand why a simple email asking to remove the link wouldn't work. And if that fails you can always just use the Google Disavow: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&...
Hey Pete - Alex from FinanceIt here (http://www.financeit.ca); thanks for the mention in your article!
We actually do solve most of the problems you outlined in your article. Our current focus is on improving existing point of sale financing systems for retailers - however we've developed an API (https://www.financeit.ca/api/v1/index.html) so any developer can offer instant approval financing online. I would love to connect anyone whose interested with our API people. Message me at acommons at communitylend.com