144 karma · joined July 20, 2015
Except for game theory maybe?
Also I disagree on the "create a new crypto system" to solve our issues trope. When talking about stolen databases I would argue it is a problem of not using state of the art to protect privacy as there is realistically no incentive to do so.
Coherent thinking and creativity (AGI) is way above and away from the neural nets we got now. And I'd argue that's what needed to make robots super helpful with random human tasks.
Kind of a tough medicine, but it may help you out from the depth of depression. I know Jordan Peterson refers to it in a couple of talks.
Also it is so sharp and so linked to modern identity politics.
> guess we'll have to publish on YT all project zero's news and see how they react.
I think you nailed it right there.
I'd like to argue batteries and mass production are the issue and genuinely hard to solve. Not async motors and inverter circuits.
To my knowledge they use 3rd party batteries for applications where it is not a limiting factor that need to be pushed over but I could be wrong.
OK they may have ended licensing something to Daimler or the like but still doubtful.
Went under the radar on HN like 3 days ago
I read between the lines "A state actor was actively tracking a group based on religion"
Also, if sent to space with a more powerful launcher, technically it could probably reach a Lagrangian point, even (slowly but efficiently) leave it. It would then probably burn out on re-entry with to much velocity, that would be the issue I'd say.
History does rhyme …