386 karma · joined June 6, 2011
I'm genuinely curious. I suppose it depends on the ultimate goal, but seeing as Coinbase is VC-funded, well...
This is where the human element comes into play, and something the blockchain cannot secure.
You could use a grayscale height map and apply textures based on relative or absolute height. Tallest point on the map? Must be a mountain. Cluster of points lower than the mean or median? Could be a lake or river.
Essentially, it would emulate real world feature distributions.
https://github.com/openai/universe-starter-agent
OpenAI's example universe agent. Remember that while their goal is an agent that works in any and all environments (read: games), you could certainly optimize yours just for MarioKart.
One thing I'd suggest is exploring a reward function, instead of using only pre-recorded training data. That is, give the AI a goal to complete (in this case, finish the race) and let it learn by itself!
So the answer is yes, we could all use more empathy.
Are you using PIR for motion detection? Did you layer any logic on top of that to keep lights from turning off if you're stationary for too long?
This is strictly for one-time shipments, targeted at the occasional sender. There are better solutions out there for small businesses.
The former is a label generally applied to flat, square design with minimal flourishes. The latter is a set of principles and standards for how digital interfaces should behave, along with a sample implementation.
In Google's MD, the clickable items are supposed to be identified either by their elevation (drop shadows) or an all-caps, secondary-color treatment and position at the bottom of elements.
It's true, icons and some text links could use some improvement.
Then, the balance swung to the other extreme, with completely-flat design. Things were decidedly 2D and "digital".
Material Design is Google's attempt (among others [1]) to standardize while providing subtle cues of depth and interaction.
The idea of Material design was not just pretty shadows and drip animations on click. It was about providing a metaphor for digital content on screens.
Still, great job on the technical effort of converting everything to Material!
Whether that's a viable UX strategy is still up for debate.
In other words, it would add more value if it could translate the actual events into human concepts of impact.
[1] http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/29079/my-house-addres...
The way current addresses have worked (mostly) is by associating with landmarks. Large street names are known by lots of locals. Smaller streets are associated with larger streets by proximity (second left on Large Street). Numbers help place an address at the beginning, middle or end of a street, on the left or right.
Grid cities have an added advantage of encoding approximate location in the street name directly.
XAddress and What3Words solve a problem for the 4bn without street addresses, but they do not help locate things or navigate to them without being online.
The point is that you decide where your data sits and who has access to it, not that it's free-for-all.
Unless I misunderstood your point completely...
There seems to be a fear of publicly disclosing who is behind projects in the whole area. Ondrej, could you offer an opinion?
The convention is that the chances of two devices getting stolen together are smaller. That's why offsite backups are a thing.