I'd like to know what the others are.
121 karma · joined February 17, 2020
I'd like to know what the others are.
Indeed I did. It showed me some generic buy-this-domain website with no substantial/relevant info (actual products killed by the Amazon mega corporation).
Nevertheless I presented my comment as a concept of `a website that lists the products killed by Amazon`, which could have been located in https://productskilledbyamazon.com, for all I know. It would be more interesting to find out if such website actually exists.
EDIT: A quick internet search does not net me any results. Which is why I'm skeptical it actually exists.
Second informal review draft from the accepted answer: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt
Downloadable iso standards (C-f sql) http://www.iso.org/PubliclyAvailableStandards
Pretty creepy. And this is from a well known company/establishment.
Perhaps modify the installation script, something like `curl | some-verification-tool | bash`
That said, I have no problem with the name CockroachDB whatsoever.
Could you elaborate on this?
I'm not sure about that. I think the real long term solution is to have a decentralized version of YouTube/video publishing platform that is resistant (invulnerable?) to censorship. I'm not saying that it's not difficult, or even impossible, but I would love to see more discussion regarding true web decentralization, not legal semantics.
With that said, I'm trying to think about what would reddit/youtube/<insert any public viewable platform> look like in my utopian world of free speech.
Where would I draw the line for which can and can't be posted? Should media related to pornography, terrorism, or pedophilia be allowed or forbidden? How about gore, violence, or any other form of crime / morally wrong concept?
I've personally seen (without intending to) the video of the New Zealand Christchurch shooting. On seeing that video I have never been more disgusted in my entire life. I felt like I wanted to puke, hell I want to puke as I type this. Should that be allowed or forbidden?
In my view everything should be allowed, that is, there should be no form of censorship whatsoever. It is up to the individual, based on the value system that he/she has accumulated throughout his/her life, to decide whether what he/she is seeing/reading is acceptable or deplorable. But no one should be able to decide that for another individual.
Command tagging wasn't really explained in the deck. I had to read this archived web page for an explanation:
https://web.archive.org/web/20191216131445/https://www.ostec...
EDIT: I didn't really drive my point home. It's not the friendly face that bothers me, in fact if it was a friendly face then it would hurt me less. But it still hurts regardless.
I just told him when to use the commands git init, remote, add, commit, and push and what the workflow looks like.
As a couple of people have mentioned, there is a drag and drop feature. How did I miss this!? Anyway it would have saved a couple of minutes of explanation.
This statement confused me, so just to be clear, this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldNnKVGxabA demonstrates the correct way to breathe right?
Wrong - pull in stomach (breathe with chest)
Right - expand stomach
Also "Ignorance is bliss." Which could be interpreted either way.