694 karma · joined November 30, 2010
Everything you read in the newspapers is absolutely true except for that rare story of which you happen to have firsthand knowledge. —Erwin Knoll
There may (MAY) be some Socalization [sic] going on here. I.e. Americans think this is what people do in America, therefore they must be like this everywhere.
Americans might keep expecting you to give them a car as a Christmas present. Europeans would never be so materialistic as to want or expect one. Have at it.
The overall TCO of a nice German car is easily $1m. So most people don't understand that 15m is only 15 cars. And I mean only. And you can't buy anything else on that hypothetical basis.
Is my partner into my or my money? Maybe I DON'T know the answer to that. But I'm past caring.
1. I don't understand. Is the wearer of 2 headphones not allowed to talk, or is he not allowed to be verbally addressed?
2. If all the girls are wearing headphones, how the fuck...? Am I RIGHT?!
You need flash, I've never got this page to work in Chrome, but it works in Firefox
1. A female who is a geek doubles her hotness to other geeks. 2. The guys in question are in the US, which has a shortage of hot women (which is hotly debated) and an even bigger shortage of geeks in general, and therefore of women who are also geeks.
Well, why is PREVENTING some citizens from changing the ALWAYS "pro-business" status quo their job?
Socialism is coming anyway (not the socialism-for-the-rich-kind), esp if you consider socialized medicine to be a trojan horse of socialism.
The reason America fought socialism is not that it was bad, it was that it was foreign (Soviet domination) and undemocratic in that form. Via democracy you can have it any time you vote for it, and even press mogul Republican billionaires can't stop you.
(See my record.) I never comment these days anyway, since I worked out that this is not a board of intellectuals (and I allow that there are conservative intellectuals), it is a board of (inherently capitalist and "selfish") Silicon Valley VCs and startup people. And here come the some people to argue with me, and some Randroids among them.
We have an actual facebook that various security agencies adore and that is owned by Goldman.
One can make the argument... but I'm not making it. I'm just pointing out a similarity.
Unsanity ShapeShifter hasn't worked since OS 10.4
and I know about
http://magnifique.en.softonic.com/mac - 10.5 only
http://www.marsthemes.com/crystalclear/ 10.7 support claimed, but it's not very radical. I'd love xfce's window look controls or a Stardock windowblinds.
I know Apple don't want anybody to do this. I know they will deliberately introduce changes that break hacks. But as I said, how can it be more effort than Linux?
-----
2. To try to prevent OSx86 hacks, DSMOS.kext uses crypto to prevent the system running essential UI elements like Finder, SystemUIServer, etc. Can't we build our own versions of those parts? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%E2%80%93Intel_architectur...
-----
3. Is this true?:
Linux desktop - dying, dead
Windows 8 - trying so hard to copy OSX/iPad/Springboard/Launchpad that everybody is gonna hate its TWO UI's! (dying?)
Mac - winning, won (by default?)
America's #1 problem is that solutions that work are often fairly labelled socialist, because they are, and thus they immediately lose all popular support, because for some reason, you are all mentally still fighting the cold war?! (So are the Russians, but that's beside the point.)
"Socialism" needs to stop being pejorative. You're trapped by political language as much as insularity and self-regard.
BTW, can't they just leave the legacy behaviour in quirks mode only or does slimness and catching Chrome trump functionality?