3,134 karma · joined April 15, 2011
[0] https://www.apartmentlist.com/research/renter-voting-prefere...
The best intern I’ve ever had was would hit me every single morning with a laundry list of questions, but, crucially they were almost 100% things she didn’t yet have the tools or context to find out on her own.
By the end she was asking me questions I hadn’t even thought to ask
It’d be fun story and a cool bit of financial history, and keeping it “alive” is definitely worth a few grand every 10 years or so.
To me, these lie on the efficient frontier of the "compiler validation" vs "less boilerplate" tradeoff. Java is decidedly nowhere near that frontier.
Really the worst system of the 3.
So it does seem that inter-generational reparations are indeed very rare.
The article is intentionally being arch by using "welfare", a word that's usually used to refer to programs that give to the poor to refer to one giving money to the rich. It's making the point that "government handouts" are reviled when they go the poor, and accepted relatively uncritically when they go to the rich
[0] https://twitter.com/WealthyCFO/status/1586053744269340672
Rents are subject to supply and demand just like everything else.
All we can hope the side effects won't be too bad.
We were in an unprecedented bull run for tech stocks for a decade plus. No guarantee that continues. Markets are anti-inductive and past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The question is "Is the cost of an explicit call option greater than the cost of finding a new job?"
There is some benefit in that with an explicit call option, you have to pay up front, while with job switching, you only incur the cost if the implicit option "expires worthless". But that's balanced by the fact that with the implicit option you're exposed to sector-wide risk (eg, see the current tech-wide turndown), while you're not with the explicit one.
So that does mean image model AI like dall-e/SD are effectively compression over this space of images that they can generate (which is at least attempting to emulate the space of 'meaningful images' to a human), since given a seed, they'll deterministically produce the same image, and that seed is much smaller than the information needed to describe every pixel in the image.
Where is this halcyon universe where the median (or even the 75th percentile) American:
* Paid for their children to go to college
* Bought a new car every other year
'Cause that doesn't resemble any point in the past century of the universe we currently inhabit.
I want to know that the people I'll be working with are at least baseline competent in that regard.