I wrote it's more pleasant to be used by programmers by giving better experience, then I wrote it's ecosystem is immature, but growing. As of now, it has its better and worse sides.
5,053 karma · joined November 4, 2015
They announced beta version for Windows in the last few weeks, so what to expect? I've been using it on linux desktop for 4 months so far, there were many problems, but it's absolutely the best framework so far. It's miles ahead of Qt (which I've been programming in since 2010). Dart and flutter are just years ahead of Java, C#, Qt and React Native in terms of positive programmer experience, productivity, good looking UI. There are so many bad things to say too, but all I can think about are only due to immature ecosystem, but that's changing literally daily.
Many android phones detect being in pocket and lock screen automatically to prevent accidental touches.
Web browser shouldn't be doing it tho.
Not accepting any discussion by blocking all community efforts is quite bad imo. Would like still like to start any discussion, put effort into making even smallest change, to be blocked? This is strong sign of ignorance.
I often contribute to OSS on gitlab and github. When a single/first MR is not merged OR commented on within a week I don't even try there again, waste of time.
Who watches the watchers? How do you know what's running on the servers?
* installation instructions for each of the images
* mountable persistent path/volume for transport and backup
* what ports do I export?
* how do the images interact? Do I need one of them or 3?
* do I need to write any config file and mount it in docker before starting?
* what features flags are available to use with environment variables?
What is `fastocloud_load_balance`? Do I need it for basic deployment with 2 cameras?
Look at installation instructions of these two https://hub.docker.com/_/traefik https://hub.docker.com/_/postgres
No, I don't think there is anything wrong with it, that's how we can change direction of the company and produce good. I think that's a very problematic path filled with mine-lands where employees decide how company makes money. GitHub can just outsource this project to Russia, Australia or India, still make money and deliver the project. Silencing voiced of those who speak, but still, being on a path of conflict of interests between board members and workers.
Yes, but also companies exist literally only to make money. Companies can't exist without workers. Once a company finds itself in a position of conflict of interest between political views of workers and point of existence of the company - where contracts bring money... we're going to see interesting things.
I wonder, who will break first?
The company will decide it's better to bend to political opinions of employees and end the contract == pay a lot of $money$ for breaking the contract early without delivery and set another precedent where employees decide how and with whom company makes money = uncertain company. Who will make future contracts with such company? Would you outsource your project delivery to a company where employees decide whether your project/office/political stand is good or bad?
Or maybe employees will decide they don't want to work for a company and risk unemployment? Who will risk employing a person who rebels against board members of a company and causes financial damages over broken contract?
I would like to see 100s of GitHub employees leaving GitHub and MS to prove their point, rather than working on the contract, being paid 10x salary of their immigrant desk cleaners and shouting how bad it is the contract exists.
It's "unpaid labour" now.