> the court just doesn’t want to do its job.
What do you think its job is.
1,706 karma · joined January 4, 2011
> the court just doesn’t want to do its job.
What do you think its job is.
What in the world.
It's a bizarre take because you have always done it and it has not worked out. What.
Uh yes it does?? What are you talking about.
This is like saying that the part of driving where you wash dishes is why you, personally, need a dishwasher in your car. There is no feature that would fail the challenge if you can always claim that you need it to render a web page.
Local disk cache is a standard and reasonable feature expected by the vast majority of browser users. You are being obtuse.
By that time, they will have realized immense value before seeing some of what you see. Sounds like an endorsement of spec-kit.
> are you interested in my opinion on (n)vim?
The first comment is three short lines. One of them is the extremely reasonable and relevant question of where else this has happened in VSCode.
And you think that the commenter is wondering about your opinion on (n)vim? That is what you think they are interested in?
Could you just, like, ignore the signature if it is distracting you from the only other line that has a question in it?
> The law is about platforms that deal in pornography, self harm, etc
So...not exclusive to Apple.
What a strange claim. How late is too late to be considered early?
> Microsoft is employing dark patterns to goad users into paying for storage?
That Microsoft is employing dark patterns is neither surprising nor a question. Can you explain this gross departure from the actual title jpmitchell[1]? Here is the original for reference:
> How Microsoft abuses its users
This is much more interesting and accurate.
Someone tried to redefine a well-established term in the middle of an internet forum thread about that term. The word that has been pushed to uselessness here is "pedantry".
(That is your argument.)