allthatglitters

Having read quite a bit of Dan, I'd have to say this is terribly tongue-in-cheek. I hope I'm not wrong...

This article supports many of the common fallacies that accompany most discussions of "wealth inequality" - and as usual believes it should be rectified... (by whom?) For a refreshing point of view on this topic, read http://cafehayek.com/2014/01/wealth-is-not-a-glob-of-homogen... . It may not change your mind but it is certainly another way to think about the issue.

Cinnamon (a Gnome variant of pleasing minimalism) on Wheezy.

Given two choices (equal probability; redundant?) - which is the case once you have two doors - switching cannot change the odds. Have someone flip a coin. Call it. But before the flipper looks at the coin - (whether he KNOWS the result or not) he asks you to consider switching. Explain how the option of switching changes the probability of a correct or incorrect call. Inference?