2,248 karma · joined February 23, 2014
Like Anthropic and most big tech companies, they don't want to show off the best until they need to. They used to stockpile some cool features, and they have time to think about their strategy. But now I feel like they are in a rush to show off everything and I'm worried whether the management has time to think about the big picture.
Feels like codex is for product managers to fix bugs without touching any developer resources. Then it’s insanely surprising!
Back then, Javis wasn’t built for code, but it was a surprisingly great coding companion. Yes. It only gave you 80% working code, but because you had to get your hands dirty, you actually understand what was happening. It didn't give me 10x but I'm happy with 2x with good understanding on what's going on.
Fast-forward to now: Copilot, Cursor, roo code, windsurf and the rest are shockingly good at output, but sometimes the more fluent the AI, the sneakier the bugs. They hand you big chunks of code, and I bet most of us don't have a clear picture of what's going on at ground 0 but just an overall idea. It's just too tempting to blindly "accept all" the changes.
It’s still the old wisdom — good devs are the ones not getting paged at 3am to fix bugs. I'm with the OP. I'm more happy with my 2x than waking up at 3am.
But now, the headwinds apparently have changed. Sad :(
If you’ve got friends working in the NHS, you’ve probably heard their biggest frustration: the system is painfully slow and stupid!!!
`Before I took the job, I checked on the reasoning behind the change. The board did not remove Sam over any specific disagreement on safety, their reasoning was completely different from that. I'm not crazy enough to take this job without board support for commercializing our awesome models.`
https://twitter.com/eshear/status/1726526112019382275
Regardless it's a tragic for staff remaining in OpenAI...
https://twitter.com/eshear/status/1726526112019382275
He adds even more drama lol
You know OpenAI is now overly done. I'd say it's now in archive.
I bet if you fund a startup for $1M, they'll deliver a way better product than the $125M one!