3,819 karma · joined August 16, 2016
Unified memory puts Apple in it's own category for certain workloads however, but since we're talking about gaming here, and not local LLMs, Apple simply cannot compete on any kind of value comparison
As is I'll keep my eyes peeled for future versions, I really like the concept, and deal-breaker might be fixed in the future
There is so much wrong with this phone...
I tried using it a bit but I couldn't stand how unresponsive it was.
I don't know if their later phones have gotten better,I hope so, because I love everything about that company except their (previous) products.
Next will be a pixel for sure.
They seem to have a lot of goodwill from customers. I'll never understand why.
Written from my OnePlus 8t.
I think the t is for "trash"
We have of course abolished slavery since then.
Which is a weird way of saying I don't think we necessarily should put a monetary value to people. Instead we need to realize that money isn't everything in life. So much of life is unpriceable, and that's as it should be. Attempting to price the unpriceable necessarily makes a mockery of the unpriceable thing.
If course it being Google, it got cancelled before it had a chance to catch on.
Sorry, couldn't resist. The xzibit was too strong in your comment.
Rocket league is one of my favourite games, and I'm pretty decent at it (rank champion 1). I kinda felt like my controller was a bit broken when playing this, a lot of commands were just ignored, and forget doing stuff like speed flips. But I did feel like was controlling the car, and everything about the game looked very much like the real thing. Ball movement was on point, I didn't notice any weird bounces or anything.
The lack of opponents pulling triple flip resets and double-tapping musty's (musties?) was the most notable difference from the real thing
That said a huge pickup truck is about as far as you can get from a Camaro... Then again I'm not exactly David Hasslehoff myself either... Meh if it talks that's close enough!
I know this from personal experience.
Software very rarely exist in a vacuum
>Quality is the absence of problems
A low quality code base can be problem free if surrounding circumstances are forgiving enough. Conversely, a high quality codebase can have a lot of problems in difficult circumstances.
I haven't thought about it long enough to have a definition of quality that I'm really happy with, but I think a "resilience to hardships" would be a better definition of quality. Hardships can come in many forms, and often you're prepared for some of them but not all. Occasionally you'll be prepared for hardships that never occur. There is something to be said for being resilient against the correct kinds of hardships, which is why I'm not entirely pleased with my definition either.
But absence of problems is not it. That might be entirely circumstantial and is therefore orthogonal to quality.
Well I wasn't very far off I guess! Perhaps "5 nines" is a good threshold for new CSS features too?
I think you guys are just being salty because it's X