3,037 karma · joined January 31, 2010
EDIT: In my opinion, it's all about context.
[2] Dancho alludes to having done some sort of favor for the FBI, to which they "thank him" by releasing his name to the Bulgarian government – "clearly you can see how they say “You’re Welcome”. Could there be something going on here involving the US trading Dancho for some other information?
[3] "I’m sending you these not with the idea to see them published, but as an insurance in case things get ugly, knowing that a trusted third-party [...] can always distribute them." Here is where all logic breaks down. The use of a simple pronoun "these" throws everything off. We have up until this point assumed that the word "these" represents the photos. What else could Dancho mean by "these"?
Of course, there is always the possibility that Dancho is a paranoid schizophrenic and on a very bad trip.
People don't seem to be putting their money where their mouths are. Lack of confidence?
Here's the discussion on this topic: http://techme.me/B0l1
Explain how it happened without your knowledge. Explain how Wired won't let it ever happen again. Etc. Etc.
Readers love the transparency :)
Related: http://techme.me/ANFk ("YouPorn, Perez Hilton Exploit Bug to Obtain Your Browsing History")
I understand that this is a monumental end goal given my current situation, but can anyone point me in the direction of the best tutorial books that money can buy?
Good karma for anyone that responds :)
Thanks, Andre.
Unfortunately, the title on HN cannot be changed.
>Twitter isn’t social networking, Twitter is blogging. Therefore, the “closed” social networking argument does not apply.
>With blogging you wish to share everything you can with the rest of the world. The same can be said for Twitter. The Twitterverse, like the blogosphere, is a place to go and get educated. In these two scenarios, an “open” system trumps any and all closed-systems.
>Remember, a social network provides no real value other than fulfilling a social need. The blogosphere and the Twitterverse provide much more.
C'mon now, let's not be quick to judge. What if this lawsuit had to do with Kik violating your privacy? Sharing your contacts' information, etc.
This is what the article links to: http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE...
I doubt this lawsuit has any real substance. Other than RIM dragging Kik through the equivalent of a legal hell, there doesn't seem to be much there.
I would make little programs in 7th and 8th grade that helped with the math that we were learning at the time. I then proceeded to sell these programs to friends and classmates. It was awesome.... until I got caught!
Regardless, when you purchase something you are buying its current iteration, not something that you hope for it to one day be. This was alluded to in the comments of the original article and I thought it was worth repeating.
At this point, the only worthy advice that anyone can give you is to be honest. In this situation, honesty is by far the best policy.
Don't even try to "hide this" or "keep it a secret". Inevitably it will come out. Deal with it now before it snowballs into something much, much worse.
[1] http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9197230/Adobe_launche...
I.e. a bit of time decay, overall karma activity (Karma score + comment karma score), number of sub threads, etc.
[1] From TechCrunch: "Path is designed to share photos with only your closest 50 friends" (http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/14/path-wrong-way/)
In addition, Arrington goes on to mention the following, which I would venture to say also applies in this case:
> I am going to make another prediction. The types of photos people are going to share on Path by and large are going to be the same as the photos you see already in more public photo-sharing apps: meals, drinks, friends, kids, cats, dogs, and the random dross of daily life. Knowing that it is “private” and “safe” is not going to change much of anything.
Oracle are not very nice when it comes to Java licensing. Just ask Apache.
http://www.google.com/press/ita/
As a result of this deal, I am left wondering if Google is interested in acquiring Hipmunk.