What? The author never actually said they were going to do this, it was just to make the point of how expensive London is, which is what the parent comment said.
I cannot imagine that google wants to rollout the current iteration of their self driver car at scale to consumers. They want they technology sorted out and for that phase of it, they do not care what the car looks like and you cannot assume that's how their self driving cars will always look.
Reading the other posts, this doesn't seem to be the case. It is "hacking" because he was creative in how he pursued this goal while still working within the framework
The grey area with online poker is because it isn't explicitly made illegal in the wire act (online sports betting is explicitly illegal), but the UIGEA legislates against games of chance which there are arguments that poker is not such a game but it hasn't been tried in court. Many sites used that argument to offer online poker to US residents and had their domains and bank accounts seized, Pokerstars settled for over 700mm and bought Full Tilt Poker in the process. The US govt doesnt care where you are based if you are violating US law and attracting US customers.
No, the author isnt. This is the full quote:
"The price after the Silk Road seizure has remained fairly constant but the currency itself has fallen from a high of $260 to about $130 this morning."
It is a horrible worded statement as it doesnt specify the time frame within which the price fell from 260 to 130, but they clearly state it has been stable since the SR seizure
Please do blog about it. Freelancing while traveling is a concept that a lot of us are really drawn to, but most of the current blogs focus on the travel and only briefly mention the freelancing aspect. Maybe if you focused a bit more on the business side of things you could find a niche within the blogosphere.
I agree with the point you are making, but for clarity's sake wanted to add that syringe distribution has many different legal (and pseudo-legal) standings across the US. In Boston (not sure if it is all of MA) you can buy needles and syringes from a pharmacy, while in Maine they require a prescription; however, many communities in Maine still have needle exchange programs
Still not news. This article is nothing new, it simply took a piece from another article, added a title and called it good. They didn't even really add any commentary, other than saying one of the sources was their friend.
That doesnt stop you from promoting "issues" and highlighting a stance a candidate has on those issues, you simply cannot use the magic words [1]. This is a fairly strange defense because 501(c)(3) organizations are almost synonymous with this type of lobbying.
Not really sure where you got the idea that the some esters of testosterone are ok for first time users and others aren't, except maybe no ester. Many (most?) Doctors prescribe cypionate for trt in the US, and these aren't just the anti aging clinics.
This seems way over the top. How muuch extra reliability does this get you when compared to RAID+1 locally and amazon glacier or s3? For the super paranoid, add a non-amazon based online backup as well. This seems to have made sense before these services were available, but just doesn't seem worthwhile anymore
Traditional brokerages face all of these issues as well and actually comply with them, all while offering lower fees.
There are a handful of startups that are looking to have offerings that are appealing to funds and other non-retail investors, so things do seem to be going in that direction. For the time being though, it is more profitable to cater to the retail investors than pursue a low margin [potentially high volume] clientele.
In almost all cases like this, your absolute best choice is to simply give them what they want and gtfo of there. If they see you playing with something in your pocket, it could escalate things very quickly
This is really, really misplaced advice. As a programmer, he knows how to program, he does not know how to profitably trade, nor is it easy to learn. An analogy would be telling a chef to open a restaurant because they are a good cook. While common advice, it isnt that simple. The analogy also fails because it is much easier to learn to run a restaurant than it is to trade profitably, let alone on the forex markets.
He has valuable skills that should easily command him more than what he "needs" to make, he should use those skills instead of attempting to learn an unrelated, saturated, and difficult field.
That's not exacty how polticians treat billionaires, or anybody really. I'm not saying its free of corruption by any means, but almost nothing that transparently corrupt occurs
Reddit has its place, but the level of poker discussion there will never approach that of twoplustwo which is a resource any aspiring player should use
Read the website. Despite the name, it is not about defunding the entire nsa, but instead about removing the authorization and funding for blanket data collection
Exactly. Major elections arre infrequent. Nate got his start with sports. Let him do sports the majority of the time, but when elections come around, give him an outlet to do politics as well. Disney is a pefect fit.
Ok, then I misunderstood the comment. I was thinking they were saying $20 was too much to spend, not that they wish they could get away with only spending $20 per acquistion. Thanks for clarifying!
I don't know a ton about your industry, but why can't you spend $20 per customer? I can't imagine your clv is lower than that. Or are you saying you wish you only had to spend that much?
...the point is to gets 10s of millions. Simply because they are already making a lot does not mean they should avoid optimizations. If they had that attitude, they would have "stopped" at whatever number was deemed to be enough. "Why make X change, they are already makings 100s of millions with the appstore?" A business's goal is to maximize profit. This is a clear option that has minimal costs in comparison to the returns that even you recognized. You are trying too hard not to be wrong.