220 karma · joined October 7, 2008
(As in, are we really giving Google yet another look into the websites we visit?)
On the next page, the other "fugue" does bizarre things that I don't think a human composer would. The beginning is entirely discontinuous, and doesn't really sound like a beginning. A real fugue isn't just something being played repeatedly in different intervals.
If that's the best that the program has to offer, then I'm not sure what it's accomplished. Just because it can combine complicated things doesn't mean its composed anything, because it doesn't understand the parts. If someone copied and pasted parts of great books, and then tried to weave the parts together, would the result be any good? Or even great books by the same author. Maybe that's a weak analogy though.
I feel sorry for the Slate writer if he can't tell the difference between the Bach and this noise, he's seriously missing out.
I agree heartily.
When downloading podcasts, an activity that could be handled by a perl script and wget, iTunes likes to use my entire processor. I have no idea why, and its done so for several versions now.
Seems to fly in the face of Apple's vaunted design and organization.....
Lets look at the First Amendment, shall we?
"Congress shall make no law"..."abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"
Hmm... doesn't say you have to be a person. In fact it seems to just say, Congress can't make a law... abridging speech. Not speech by people, or speech by companies, or speech by the media. Just speech. As in, anyone can say whatever. Especially about politics.
Justice Kennedy brilliantly points out: '"If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech." He also noted that since there was no way to distinguish between media and other corporations, these restrictions would allow Congress to suppress political speech in newspapers, books, television and blogs.' (via Wikipedia)
Honestly I'm not sure what's going to change... rich people and unions already dump money into politics, through various means.
Because there aren't thousands of different types of PCs of every shape and size, tablet, netbook, professional laptop, gaming laptop, gaming desktop, small form factor desktop, workstation...
All of these computers could run OS X, but Apple doesn't want them to.
And lest we forget, Gruber's job is to talk up Apple('s stock price). Why anyone should take his opinion seriously is beyond me. He has a vested monetary interest in Apple fanboyism.
Can I get a hip internet liberal high five?
Comparisons to Snow Leopard are particularly unfair... If you don't pay the full price for Snow Leopard, you paid the full price for Leopard! How is that actually cheaper again?
Not to mention the fact that Apple can freely move costs among its hardware and software because they're selling all of it, for example charging more for RAM and less for OS X. MS has to make the money on its software.
-- A happy XP user since 2001, who supports and can use any other newer operating system, but likes XP.
Its still a little cheaper than the iPod Touch was originally, isn't it?
http://discovermagazine.com/2007/sep/global-warming-the-grea...
Let me be even more sarcastic and snide... maybe people who are afraid of global warming are close minded and afraid of change...
"If a pretty poster and a cute saying are all it takes to motivate you, you probably have a very easy job. The kind robots will be doing soon."