The ban on Xiaomi is more of an attack as part of the economic war. The supposedly military ties due to a silly award were definitely shoehorned into this.
1,427 karma · joined May 12, 2018
The ban on Xiaomi is more of an attack as part of the economic war. The supposedly military ties due to a silly award were definitely shoehorned into this.
Xiaomi, the Chinese consumer electronics company, which definitely does only consumer products, is restricted from buying microchips. The excuse was an award that was granted by the CCP to the chairman of Xiaomi, a type of award that is given away to 100 people EVERY year.
Similarly, some have used the phrase that for a small country to have oil is equal to a curse. What they are neglecting to say, is that those countries with oil will not be able to pursue it for the benefit of the people simply because the big countries will squander it. As if they are trying to rationalize the exploitation of the small countries.
Either eMMC or M.2 or SSD should be fine.
Population of Australia: 25 million
China has 56 times the population of Australia.
Those 16 days times 56 make 896 days, which is far more than 365 days (a year).
And all cursive writings looks alike from far away.
What is wrong with them?
There are feuds here and there in scientific fields, and those do not advance science.
Is Sci-Hub down? Some of the presumably mirrors redirect to ScienceMag instead.
It looks like they are trying to limit their liability by claiming there was nothing at all that they could have done.
Social networks can be weaponized to sow discontent and help you attack a country from within. Once again, war is through the civilians and you bypass the army.
1. We do not use the term statistically significant because it is misleading. But the article does not make even a case for statistics and they use the term as a figure of speech.
2. The premise of the article is that the Outreachy program may not bring diversity to Debian as fast as the author desires, so they postulate tha the CoC does not have an impact. Inconsequential.
With those $15 digital microscopes, you get at least 150X.
And all credibility from the article is now gone.