Because of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Online_Privacy_Pro...
1,184 karma · joined May 15, 2008
Because of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Online_Privacy_Pro...
Performance has also been very poor (we use Jena SDB). I don't know if poor performance is an implementation problem or an overall weakness.
I would also bet your uptime is worse than you think if you're not actively measuring it. However, I'm sure it is "good enough". I doubt it is worth spending an order of magnitude more money to get better than 3 9's for your business, which is more or less the point of the article imo.
I find the percent availability -> hours of downtime chart on wikipedia to be a really helpful reference for these types of discussions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
The ability to easily execute commands on several remote servers is really appealing. At work, I only need to be able to ssh to 5 different servers and I frequently don't have a free screen terminal.
<person first-name="John" last-Name="Smith" />
is better than <person>
<first-name>John</first-name>
<last-name>Smith</last-name>
</person>
is often very difficult. In the wild, I've seen both strategies used depending on the situation.Funding has nothing to do with it.
task :name do |t|
# do stuff
end
I'm not sure what's the closest equivalent syntax you could create in python.I couldn't find a good source for how many employees they have, but its in the thousands, so they have been able to make this work on a large scale.
The result links are hard to read as well. I have no idea what the numbers mean... perhaps it should just say result? Whitespace between each line would help readability as well. The whole result page is wall of text.
Also, the front page of the site needs to make this goal explicitly clear. Instead, the front page gives almost no indication of what this is for, and shows a lot of weird sounding empty result sets.
Getting that kind of uptime is much harder than it sounds and for a lot of websites not worth the extra cost. How much money would pay to go from 99.9% uptime (~9 hours /year) to 99.99% (52 minutes)?
{
"directories_to_backup": [
{"directory_name": "/media/programming",
"exclude_dirs": ["/media/programming/log_files",
"/media/programming/temp_files" ]
},
{"directory_name": "/media/documents",
"exclude_dirs": ["/media/documents/archive"]
}
}Also, why not just use a python data structure? Do you really need a plain text config file?