524 karma · joined March 18, 2009
Personal sweet spot me in terms of pleasant readability is: 4k 24" @ 200% scale (so same screen estate as 1080p) or 5k 27" @ 200% scale (same screen estate as 1440p).
[1] https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management
The JS implementation of Gradify [1] did something similar but by using CSS linear-gradient which is even better in terms of performance. I wonder if the same could be implemented here.
It was all good but not aesthetically pleasing in terms of readability (wonder if Text Editors will ever focus on improving leading and tracking, or better fonts). And lack of other visual goodies like easy columns.
Tried almost all todo apps and the lack of flexibility was always annoying. I wanted the flexibility of a text editor - an enhanced text editor.
Last year, I discovered Notion and have never looked back. I use it for everything. It's not perfect, but it's pretty close to what I've always wanted.
I do get that not all of these can be done and many are specific to niches. But I believe a lot of boilerplate can be done by one framework.
And an opinionated framework can do a lot. Say Payment integration modules (Stripe, Paypal et. al), Logging & Error Reporting, Opinionated Backend/Frontend and storage for basic CRUD, CI/CD integration and deployment workflows working with cloud providers, tight integration with a messaging queue etc.
Something like this could be a massive time saver in communities like Indiehackers.
However, the future of pain-free Hackintosh doesn't seem very likely. It's rumored (or confirmed?) Apple will do its proprietary ARM system as MacOS eventually moves onto that [1] (maybe not this year, but in the near future). And then there's the T2 chip.
I have been slowly moving away from Mac in general as I have no need for it (not a Mac/iOS developer). The alternatives are just as good or better for my taste.
[1] https://www.tomshardware.com/news/apple-mac-arm-cpus-2020-in...
[1] https://uxmovement.com/content/why-you-should-never-use-pure...
No. They're not accidental. They're entirely intentional, done by sheer hard work.
On a related note, I am surprised a person who claims to write about UI design has a website with that background color. The contrast is just awful.
Yes I am talking about some of Balkans (Serbia, Greece), Baltics (Estonia, Lithuania), Eastern EU (Ukraine, Bulgaria, Romania) where the rates can be $20-30 an hour for very decent devs.
That being said, it's prudent not to add the most common religious or cultural symbols for a global product. If you cater to one, you'll be expected to do the same for other cultural rituals.
It was a dismissable admin notice that looked like an ad and wasn't exactly a tracking link (in the wp.org classifications at least), but a generic marketing campaign link [2].
[1] https://github.com/WordPress/wporg-plugin-guidelines/pull/69... [2] https://github.com/Yoast/wordpress-seo/blob/12.6.1/admin/cla...
- It was an upsell to the Pro version of free plugin. Not some random ad spam.
- The ad was an admin notice - which appear in WordPress on top of every page in the backend Admin Area in what's generally the notification area.
- It's free, GPL, and open source - you know, "No Warranties" and all that.
Grayhat, and not something you should ever do. But not as nefarious as everyone is making it sound like.
WP.org is about freedom, so they're unlikely to restrict it either unless malicious: https://github.com/WordPress/wporg-plugin-guidelines/pull/69...
Being very involved in the WordPress industry, what I find funny is the majority of angry reviews masquerading as victims are from entitled pseudo devs who sell WordPress sites to clients and now they were made to look bad because they had automatic updates enabled while charging their customers for a retainer package with "plugin & themes updates".
How about buying premium version in the first place just as you charged your client for it.
If there are 100 bad stories out there, that's enough of a failure of a company irrelevant of its size. And I have personally conducted the support experiment multiple time over the years to have the first-hand experience.
Either way, since you clearly have a vested interest in Ad companies from your HN comment history, I shall engage no more.
Given your vested interest in Ads and Google in specific, I am sure you know this already.
After spending ~100k, our ads randomly stopped working last month without changing anything. Support took 10 days to reply saying the account was up for a review (no notifications sent, no indicators). Yet, it still wasn't working.
Booked a consultation with one of their so-called "Experts", he couldn't find anything wrong and suggested to contact support again.
After the initial 10 days response, still waiting for a reply from so-called support 20 days later. I'd assume support only exists for companies that spend millions a year.
Yeah, when their batteries swell up twice in 3 years, and they take 11 days each time and you're out of your main workstation for that long? See how that compares with an hour fixing it yourself.
Recently, I tried Firefox again on Windows. And the experience is amazing indeed - faster, smoother, and with trackers blocking, very pleasant. And with strict protection, that's sort-of a builtin ad blocker.
Something still feels off on MacOS even though the last version has been a massive improvement for MBP Retina.
Apple music is available in another 59 countries that Spotify is not.
I currently rely on https://emailclientmarketshare.com/ (by Litmus) for this but if someone's aware of a better data source, I'd like to know.
Usually the GPU process. Even if your tabs are all inactive, killed by something like Great Discarder, the GPU process continues to use a lot of RAM (2GB in my case, at times) and CPU.
I am not sure if it's a Mac-specific issue though.
The days of maintaining two versions of a website - a "mobile version" (in AMP) and the normal - are back again. Takes me back to the WAP days (not saying it's that bad). Then there are those that are going AMP-only - getting locked into AMP and all the excessive-yet-limited JS baggage (try building a full-fledged site and you will have a lot of AMP JS). JS compilation and execution isn't cheap on phones either. I sure as hell can make faster-rendering sites without that AMP bloat that can compete despite their prefetch.
This proprietary tech isn't helpful and is a massive dev resource sink. And let's not kid ourselves, there were many better ways for Google to prioritize and encourage speedy websites.
Should GitHub dominate the market and gobble up competition, we all know how it goes for its parent company.
Personally I liked this font much better than the other opensource alternatives, especially with the number of weights it offered. I am glad it's gotten popular.