asdev

This is classic engineer trying to build a business. Indie software is more of a business than it is software. Everyone wants to do the easy part(coding/tech), nobody wants to relentlessly service customers and do marketing/distribution.

Coding is easy. Building a business is hard, whether indie or VC backed.

this is the best lead generation form i've ever seen

how many changes(% of all changes) need an entire infra stack spun up? have you tried just having the changes deployed to dev with a locking mechanism?

Does anyone get actual insightful reviews from these code review tools? From most people I've spoke with, it catches things like code complexity, linting, etc but nothing that actual relates to business logic because there's no way it could know about the business logic of the product

How do you remediate failures?

in what context?

How is this different from Extend(Also YC)?

Are you still doing healthcare back office automation? Would love to learn why you pivoted out if not, happy to DM as well

Aren't most of the large frontier model providers SOC 2 compliant? I think AWS Bedrock is also SOC 2 compliant. Not sure why you would need to self host anything then as you'll get turnkey secure solutions from the bigger plays

Made the same except you get terminal sessions instead of overriding it with a custom UI: https://github.com/built-by-as/FleetCode

it's also really slow to use structured outputs. mainly makes sense for offline use cases

repo:https://github.com/built-by-as/HNHiringStats

agree that AI can kinda infer business context sometimes. in my experience, it doesn't work that well.

a lot of the time, debugging isn't a logic issue, but more of a state exploration issue. hence you need to add logging to see the inputs of what's going on, just seeing a control flow isn't super useful. maybe codemaps could simulate some inputs in a flow which would be super cool, but probably quite hard to do.

if you know that context, you don't need a codemap

A feature like this isn't useful because knowing what connects to what, dependencies, etc. means nothing without business context. AI will never know the why behind the architecture, it will only take it at face value. I think technical design docs which have some context and reading the code is more than enough. This sits in the middle ground where it lacks the context of a doc and is less detailed than the code.

I built an open source project to make the whole workflow easier: https://github.com/built-by-as/FleetCode

you can use git worktrees and just have multiple Claude Code terminal instances working on each worktree. That way they don't clash, just delete the worktree when the task is done.

is Cursor Bench open? Would like to see an open benchmark for agentic coding

I built a version of this which wraps multiple CLI sessions locally. I do think the Web aspect and being able to access your CC session from anywhere is cool.

https://github.com/built-by-as/FleetCode

yeah but if Anthropic/OpenAI dedicate resources to gaining domain expertise then any tier 5 is dead in the water. For example, they recently hired a bunch of finance professionals to make specialized models for financial modeling. Any startup in that space will be wiped out

George Hotz said there's 5 tiers of AI systems, Tier 1 - Data centers, Tier 2 - fabs, Tier 3 - chip makers, Tier 4 - frontier labs, Tier 5 - Model wrappers. He said Tier 4 is going to eat all the value of Tier 5, and that Tier 5 is worthless. It's looking like that's going to be the case

AI startups are becoming obsolete daily

they've lost on basically all fronts of AI right?

so the biggest issue is having to pull down and manually edit changes? can't you just @claude on the PR to make any changes?

are you using the web ui, cli or both?

do you use the CLI or the web UI? or both?

Are researchers scared to just come out and say it because they'll be labeled as wrong if the extreme tail case happens?

I wonder what the accuracy is for Claude to always follow a Skill accurately. I've had trouble getting LLMs to follow specific workflows 100% consistently without skipping or missing steps.

You can't rely on them directly for business value, but you can rely on them indirectly is the summary of this post

Open source control pane for running coding agents in parallel: https://github.com/built-by-as/FleetCode