askl56

Ironically, it seems your site is down? Hug of death?

Regardless, that would need to be fact checked?

The problem inevitably has flared up: Twitter's head of integrity leading this push has previously tweeted that Trump is a Nazi and accused the flyover states of being racist.

https://twitter.com/Liz_Wheeler/status/1265463081997484032

This isn't going to end well, and unless Twitter is going to exercise this impartially (which is impossible given a human is involved), they are going to lose their platform status, and justifiably so.

They certainly brought it to prominence:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-13/chinese-o...

Intentions are meaningless. If you're providing a service, (especially charging money for said service), you can't break it because "you're hard at work".

It's profitable through Uber's own non GAAP numbers, the GAAP numbers are still unprofitable.

Applico and they don't seem to understand how the Chinese phone market works.

So what you're saying is that they are not currently a tech company but that they intend to become one?

Whilst I agree with your premise, the problem is that they explicitly made the distinction that this was for professionals. I can't remember the precise verbiage but when Cook introduced it he said that this was by and for professionals.

> “saudi investors bought into secondary offering at X share price”

I think Beyond Meat are currently demonstrating the perils of doing a secondary offering whilst the company is unprofitable.

That's not already self evident?

Not OP but I assume project managers

To be fair that is not unique to surface books depending on which distro you are referring to

He's not defending the honour of Ukraine or making a political statement about Manafort.

He's asserting that the US has more corruption in local police and justice departments than the average American would like to believe.

Count me in

I3wm is a window manager you can run on any Linux distribution

> Since when has our "field" become so flubby that we're now eschewing the notion of background knowledge?

I think the issue is more that the skillset follows the money. If you are a top web developer who can work in adtech/fintech/e-commerce and contract then you will make far more money doing that than you ever would in pure systems engineering. It's not so much that background knowledge is fluff, moreso that their focus is probably a lot more scattered than it used to be, and their background knowledge is perhaps in other places.

I've always believed that "genius" is simply mental illness with an audience.

People such as Mozart were known for feeling nervous anxious etc, until they wrote music which was cathartic, which nowadays I'm sure would be diagnosed as some sort of mental illness.

Rupert Murdoch does not own the Guardian. That is laughable. It's owned by The Scott Trust Limited, which was formerly a charitable trust and is dedicated to keeping the Guardian's editorial independence.

Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-dyiASgGkk

He's in a financial position to afford $10 a month for the relative luxury of not being served ads, meaning he has a relatively large disposable income, meaning he's the kind of person I would want to advertise to.

The laws in the UK are already far more restrictive than our American cousins when it comes to advertising. “traffic data” and “location data" are already covered by the e-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC.

Source: http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/differences-privacy-la...

Surely this passes into the realms of illegality?

But that's not medically true? The proximate medical cause has to be valid and complete, otherwise what is the point in listing it? A death certificate provides full information as to why someone died for the relatives and for the state. This provides them with an explanation of how and why their relative died. It also gives them a permanent record of information about their family medical history, which may be important for their own health and that of future generations.

It's not zero sum. As somebody who has come from money and made a lot of money in a field entirely unrelated to my parents and with zero financial help from them after university, a lot of the disparities I see between myself and others in my situation who came from more disadvantaged backgrounds is that they spend their money far less wisely because they think that, for example, a house in the country will make them happy. I know from my childhood that is not necessarily the case.

What do you mean by it's a job ad?

Are either of the relationships long distance?

Isn't that the esssence of programming?

A simple javascript snipped to calculate how much netflix you have watched.